new cd

yoonephy

New Member
the new intel celeron d has a build in 512KB of cache, and made by 65 nano tech. i heard the performance kicks a**
 
wrong, its called celeron for a reason. its like athlon 64 vs. pentium 4... athlon 64 performs better with lower frequencys.... celeron at a high frequency still wont perform that great. i guess 65nm will be overclockable but heat isnt always the only problem, and CPU heat specifically isnt always the problem.

generally it wont do that well... compared to a performance built processor like pentium 4 or better (namely athlon 64 ;) )
 
fade2green514 said:
wrong, its called celeron for a reason. its like athlon 64 vs. pentium 4... athlon 64 performs better with lower frequencys.... celeron at a high frequency still wont perform that great. i guess 65nm will be overclockable but heat isnt always the only problem, and CPU heat specifically isnt always the problem.

fade2green514 said:
generally it wont do that well... compared to a performance built processor like pentium 4 or better (namely athlon 64 ;) )

Huh is that a clever comparison in your opinion? It's like comparing the Sempron to the A64 or P4. :)

True they are called Celeron & Semprons for a reason, they are both budget chips.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top