nm?

that is why the C2D beat the X2, the X2 is 90nm (i think) and the C2D is 65nm
You were right in saying with a smaller process, you can fit more on a CPU, but thats not what makes it faster then the X2's. Because if that were the case, the Pentium D's would be better because they are 65nm.
 
[-0MEGA-];568985 said:
You were right in saying with a smaller process, you can fit more on a CPU, but thats not what makes it faster then the X2's. Because if that were the case, the Pentium D's would be better because they are 65nm.


I didn't know that pentium D's where 65nm, thanks


How low do you think they can go nm wise, because right now the silicon is at atomic level, well the new HK transistor will be at that level i think
 
Well the smallest a transistor can physically be is 3 atoms and it's unlikely that that will be feasable in the foreseeable future.
 
Back
Top