Official "Which is Better? 4 core or 8 core" Thread

[Twist86]

Re-arrange the letters and you get;

Fail.

LOL.


Another pointless core vs core thread.

Will give you a wild hint of how I voted....it rhymes with chip.

 

[Kornowski]

My comment wasn't aimed at you Omar. Just this thread in general.

 

[laznz1]

You know its gotta be good when it has wheels

yip 16 core wins end thread

 

[Twist86]

yip 16 core wins end thread

32 core processor wins..end thread.

 

[Irishwhistle]

32 core processor wins..end thread.

Nope! 64-corehttp://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2007/08/64-core-chips-a.html wins!

 

[Troncoso]

LOL.


Another pointless core vs core thread.

Will give you a wild hint of how I voted....it rhymes with chip.

chip rhymes with none of the vote options...

 

[Twist86]

Nope! 64-corehttp://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2007/08/64-core-chips-a.html wins!

bah! It makes me wonder what the military has...128+ cores??? I mean they are always 3-4 generations a head of us lol.

 

[Irishwhistle]

bah! It makes me wonder what the military has...128+ cores??? I mean they are always 3-4 generations a head of us lol.

apparently intel is working on a 32-core CPU right now... not sure if it's true or not, but if it is that might mean 32 cores for everyone... if you have the money.

 

[Twist86]

Geez whats the world to do with 32? lol...they can't hardly support 4 atm ^-^

 

[Kornowski]

apparently intel is working on a 32-core CPU right now... not sure if it's true or not, but if it is that might mean 32 cores for everyone... if you have the money.

Yeah, and nobody would buy it. They don't want more than 2 cores, lol.

 

[Irishwhistle]

Yeah, and nobody would buy it. They don't want more than 4 cores, lol.

fix'd

 

[Archangel]

apparently intel is working on a 32-core CPU right now... not sure if it's true or not, but if it is that might mean 32 cores for everyone... if you have the money.

Immagine what the "performance" tab in the taskmanager will look like... widescreen mandatory I say!