overclocking potential

ride3k

New Member
Hello, I will be making a very very very cheap system and wanted to put the cheapest 775 socket CPU. I found this, Intel Celeron 420 Conroe, and was wondering, what is the overclocking potential of this cpu? could i bring it up to around a 2.9-3.0 to use until i have the money to upgrade to a e6550 or e6750? I will be using the computer as more or less a project rig, but i will have a TV tuner and big screen to also use as a TV/dvd player
 
I've seen them hit 3GHz but with overclocking there's no gurantee you will be able to hit a given frequency.
 
I've seen them hit 3GHz but with overclocking there's no gurantee you will be able to hit a given frequency.


what kind of cooling though? I would hazard that it wont be on air cooling and if he's looking fora budget CPU because he cant afford better just yet then i doubt he has enough to give it water cooling of phase change?

If it can make that on air then i'm impressed! :)
 
I believe that those reach more around 2.6-2.8.

EDIT: Scratch that. It seems like 3.0 isn't going to be too far off.
 
I believe it was the stock cooler they used. Keep in mind the TDP of a Celeron 400 is only 35W.
 
what kind of cooling though? I would hazard that it wont be on air cooling and if he's looking fora budget CPU because he cant afford better just yet then i doubt he has enough to give it water cooling of phase change?

If it can make that on air then i'm impressed! :)

yeah, ive read in countless places that these chips can hit 2.8 on stock cooling, i was just seeing if anyone hear had a good idea. But i think im going to get a 2.8 Celeron D chip, and take it up to 3.2 - 3.4, its only one buck more for the chip
 
yeah, ive read in countless places that these chips can hit 2.8 on stock cooling, i was just seeing if anyone hear had a good idea. But i think im going to get a 2.8 Celeron D chip, and take it up to 3.2 - 3.4, its only one buck more for the chip

Unless I'm mistaken, a PD will not beat even a Celeron Conroe chip. I'm not absolutely sure, cause I don't know much of those chips, but it does utilize the far superior Conroe C2d architecture.
 
Unless I'm mistaken, a PD will not beat even a Celeron Conroe chip. I'm not absolutely sure, cause I don't know much of those chips, but it does utilize the far superior Conroe C2d architecture.


even if i took the PD chip to 3.4ghz? I wouldnt feel safe taking the Conroe chip higher than 100% OC, even though ive read that its been done very easily, and 100% oc would take me to 3.0-3.2
 
if your gonna buy that CPU and your on a budget, i suggest get a Athlon 64 x2 the cheapest brisbane you can find. Those things can also overclocking to 3ghz and thier dual-core as well.
 
Just get the celeron. Much cheaper, and the new Celeron's are kicking some major butt. I read that a 2 GHz Celeron 440 (Conroe-L Celeron) will keep up with a 3.6 GHz Pentium 4 in most benchmarks. Pretty crazy, especially considering the difference in TDP, heat output, and how well both overclock. The Conroe-L Celeron is far superior to the Pentium 4.

Just gotta love the Core architecture!
 
even if i took the PD chip to 3.4ghz? I wouldnt feel safe taking the Conroe chip higher than 100% OC, even though ive read that its been done very easily, and 100% oc would take me to 3.0-3.2

Yes, I believe so. The Pd was based on the netburst P4 architecture, It's IPC rate was basically shot. A Celeron based on the C2d chipset will be much more efficient, not to mention faster!
 
Back
Top