Aastii
VIP Member
I've played all the way through single player so far in MW2. Pretty sweet.
so once again, it isn't very long?
So it isn't even worth getting for single player
I've played all the way through single player so far in MW2. Pretty sweet.
It took me about 6-7 hours on the easiest difficulty. It's very cinematic obviously. The beginning wasn't as good as CoD4, but the last couple missions were definitely something.so once again, it isn't very long?
So it isn't even worth getting for single playeror is it a short burst of something very very good?
It took me about 6-7 hours on the easiest difficulty. It's very cinematic obviously. The beginning wasn't as good as CoD4, but the last couple missions were definitely something.
Why do people throw a fit about a game's campaign being short? I can run through Portal in a little over an hour and I consider it to be one of my favorite games.
some games a longer single player is better, some a shorter one is better.
Portal needed a shorter one, and i agree playing 1-2 hours of portal is perfect, even now i still see it as my favourite game of all time, but if it went longer the concept would get stale, the challenges would repeat themselves or because more desperate or too difficult and the brilliantly witty comedy would get old.
On cod though i feel, like in any other fps war game, a longer stoory mode, maybe 8 hours at a minimum, is much better because you need character and plot developement, the twists and turns of the scenario to be shown in all of their perfection, parts from all out warfare to covert ops, the different parts of the battle all together, and that can't be done in an hour or 2 like portal can be