lowflyinrabbit
New Member
Ok, I see there are a million posts on dual core vs single core on here, and I realize two is better than one... but all the posts seem to be about AMD. Although I would like to go AMD, I get a good price on Dell's so Intel is the only choice for me. The P4 660 w/ HT (3.6Ghz 800fsb) is only $50 more than a Pentium D 930 (3.0Ghz, 800fsb). The upgrade for a 3.2Ghz Pentium D is $200 more!
I mostly use the comp for the internet, music, basic stuff, but am slowly getting more into gaming. I realize for now most games are not taking advantage of the Pentium D and it will be slower... for now, but when comparing it to future games that will, what will the performance gains be like? What do you guys think... I need some education here so I can make a sound decision. I lean towards the P4 3.6 b/c I need it to keep up with my X1900. Rest of the comp will be: ATI X1900 XTX, 2GB in 2dimm, 150gb raptor, 20" 1600X1200, 1000:1 LCD, and the regular dell stuff. Thanks for any input!
I mostly use the comp for the internet, music, basic stuff, but am slowly getting more into gaming. I realize for now most games are not taking advantage of the Pentium D and it will be slower... for now, but when comparing it to future games that will, what will the performance gains be like? What do you guys think... I need some education here so I can make a sound decision. I lean towards the P4 3.6 b/c I need it to keep up with my X1900. Rest of the comp will be: ATI X1900 XTX, 2GB in 2dimm, 150gb raptor, 20" 1600X1200, 1000:1 LCD, and the regular dell stuff. Thanks for any input!