Q8200 vs Q6600?

O

oscaryu1

VIP Member
For my next build (Tehe :D), I was looking at the Q8200, and the Q6600.

However, there's just a few things I just happened to notice by the reviews:

On the Q8200, it supposedly does not support "Virtualization" :confused:

Also, the two pretty much neutralize each other's benefits. The Q6600 has twice the amount of cache, great for multitasking and CPU hogging applications, but the Q8200 has a faster FSB and 45nm tech, so overall better "Gaming" performance.

What's your view? :cool:
 
i would say the q6600 mainly because i like that processor, bit of a fanboy if you could say that, i would say for for a q9550 if you can but, thats most likely out of the price range if you're considering a q6600
 
I agree Q6700 for 8mb of cache.

I was looking at the wrong processor before ^-^
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top