Sticky: Official CPU-Z Benchmark Thread

Discussion in 'CPUs and Overclocking' started by Darren, Sep 29, 2016.

  1. Darren

    Darren Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    11,950
    CPU-Z Benchmark Thread

    This thread is dedicated to the CPU-Z benchmark to encourage some friendly competition among our members. Anyone may share their results, but to be included in the leaderboard you must have at least 50 posts. I've included a leaderboard of overall results as well as being broken down into desktops and laptops. I know other CPU benchmark threads exist on here but they're somewhat out of date at this point.

    I've opted for CPU-Z as my benchmarking tool because it's extremely quick to run, seems to scale well, and is built into software most of us already have. It is my benchmark and stress test of choice for overclocking as I can test stability quickly and easily. It's not the most hardcore benchmark around, but definitely the most usable for getting quick results.

    7/4/18 Update: These results are using CPU-Z Benchmark Version 17.01.64
    Please ensure you are on this version of the benchmark. If you're not the latest CPU-Z version should have it. Since I only have results for Desktops currently I will only post that. Once I get a few laptop runs I will make a graph for that as well as a combined one.


    Grab CPU-Z from here. http://www.cpuid.com/softwares/cpu-z.html

    Note: CPU-Z scores are noticeably impacted by programs running in the background like Steam, Skype, etc. Please shut down anything non essential when benching to ensure maximum results.

    To post your results please include the following in a screenshot. Open multiple instances of CPU-Z to make this easier.

    Example:

    1700 3.JPG
    1. CPU-Z benchmark results
    2. CPU-Z CPU tab
    3. Notepad with your CoFo username, date, and system info (if you want) beyond what CPU-Z already shows.


    Rules
    1. Anyone may submit their results but only members with 50 posts or more will be listed in the leaderboard. I will do my best to keep it up to date and accurate.
    2. Please do not post multiple results of the same machine at the same clocks. Run it a few times and save your best. Multiple runs at different clock speeds is fine.
    3. There are no requirements on stability/temperatures. If CPU-Z runs, you're good. I have noticed that CPU-Z dips pretty hard if you're not stable. That said, please don't melt your computer on my account. :D
    4. Clock speeds noted on the leaderboards are for manually overclocked chips. If a clock speed isn't listed it's the default clocks for that chip.
    5. For simplicity I've rounded off the decimals on the scores.


    Results

    DesktopsJuly18.JPG


    Happy benching!
     
    Last edited: Jul 4, 2018
  2. beers

    beers Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,289
    Someone is excited about new overclocking heights :p
     
    Laquer Head and Darren like this.
  3. Darren

    Darren Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    11,950
    I've felt we needed a new CPU bench thread for a while anyway. *shrug*

    But yeah. Woo H100.
     
  4. Laquer Head

    Laquer Head Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,226
    I'm not even running an OC right now, but maybe I'll juice er and post up tomorrow
     
    Darren likes this.
  5. beers

    beers Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,289
    I don't see your memory tab, sir :eek:
     
    Darren and Laquer Head like this.
  6. beers

    beers Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,289
    Seems pretty integer specific, still slightly behind at the same clocks:

    [​IMG]
     
    Darren likes this.
  7. Intel_man

    Intel_man VIP Member

    Messages:
    5,695
    I remember doing that benchmark test awhile back. I get around the 10k score on the multithread section @ 4.5ghz. Perks of having 12 threads. :D

    I'll run my cpu at those frequencies later. :p
     
    Darren likes this.
  8. Darren

    Darren Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    11,950
    I'm curious how our chips stack up in other multi-threaded benches. I'd definitely expect you to blow me out of the water.
    Balls. Forgot to change the tab. Worst OP ever.
     
    Last edited: Sep 30, 2016
    beers, Laquer Head and Intel_man like this.
  9. beers

    beers Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,289
    Any suggestions? Cinebench would be a bad choice for you :p
     
    Intel_man likes this.
  10. beers

    beers Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,289
    Check out this completely oversubscribed server at Cloudatcost =\

    [​IMG]
     
    Darren likes this.
  11. Intel_man

    Intel_man VIP Member

    Messages:
    5,695
    Get on my laptop's level!

    [​IMG]
     
    Darren likes this.
  12. _Glitch

    _Glitch Active Member

    Messages:
    345
    Didn't know that CPU-Z had a benchmark feature. That must be new.
    I'll try that when i get home. Mine is currently not overclocked, but i think i'll apply my old overclock, just for this test.
     
  13. _Glitch

    _Glitch Active Member

    Messages:
    345
    I see we have a laptop result here.
    Maybe we can have both a laptop leaderboard and a desktop leaderboard .
    Here is my work Laptop. I beat you Intel_Man :)

    I'll benchmark my Gaming Rig when i get home.

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2016
    Darren likes this.
  14. beers

    beers Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,289
    A laptop throwdown, eh? Waiting for the HQ ones to lay down the rape :p

    [​IMG]
     
    Darren likes this.
  15. _Glitch

    _Glitch Active Member

    Messages:
    345
    Damnit Beers. :p
     
  16. _Glitch

    _Glitch Active Member

    Messages:
    345
    Ok. Here is my desktop computer.
    I have the same CPU as you beers (I7-4770k), but the score is still a little bit lower. I can't get it stable at 4,6ghz. Keeps reaching CPU termal limit. So i had to settled at 4,5ghz (Wound't trust this OC for a gaming session though)
    My CPU cooler isn't a high performing one. I prioritize low noise over cooling performance.

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2016
    Darren likes this.
  17. Darren

    Darren Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    11,950
    Looks like I better get crackin' on a leaderboard after work.
     
  18. Intel_man

    Intel_man VIP Member

    Messages:
    5,695
    [​IMG]

    First past the 10k line!
     
    Darren likes this.
  19. Shlouski

    Shlouski VIP Member

    Messages:
    1,299
    I tried using cpu-z to measure performance gains, but I abandoned it for being unreliable and inconstant, due to irregular results. I have tried cpu-z on a few different platforms and I have found large fluctuations in scores while ensuring that all variables remained the same.

    Both test were done with no other programs open or running and at 0% cpu activity when they were started:

    501.png


    975.png
     
  20. beers

    beers Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,289
    What's more scary is you using a 7870K with single channel, 1600 CL11 RAM ;)
     
    Darren and Intel_man like this.

Share This Page