lemon07r
New Member
INFO: So basically I am comparing if TIM quality matters more than how it is applied (personally I think both is important). I had thought this was intresting so i had decided to share this.
My informal tests showed-
TEST SETUP: phenom II B45 3.15ghz x4 (multiplier @ x15.5), MSI 870G-45, zalman 7500 (All copper version), Prime95 (stress test), MSI OCenter (monitor temp)
TIM QUALITY RESULTS: I had been using some ok zalman thermal grease (1.2W/mK) which had been applied by finger for 4 months, so its been cured by now.
My temps were: 34'C Idle and 60'Load @ stock clock (3.15ghz)
[OC temps not available due to crashing]
TIM APPLICATION RESULTS: Today i had bought some cheaper TIM (Stars 66G) which had been the cheapest in the store (<0.65W/mK), I had wiped off the old zalman TIM with alcohol, and I had applied the cheaper TIM as flat as possible with my ID card.
My temps were: Unknown for stock clock (decided to OC straight away so the grease would settle in)
but it had idled at 24'C and loaded at 50'C OCed @ 3.255ghz stock voltage and multipier, FSB at 210(x15.5).
My informal tests showed-
TEST SETUP: phenom II B45 3.15ghz x4 (multiplier @ x15.5), MSI 870G-45, zalman 7500 (All copper version), Prime95 (stress test), MSI OCenter (monitor temp)
TIM QUALITY RESULTS: I had been using some ok zalman thermal grease (1.2W/mK) which had been applied by finger for 4 months, so its been cured by now.
My temps were: 34'C Idle and 60'Load @ stock clock (3.15ghz)
[OC temps not available due to crashing]
TIM APPLICATION RESULTS: Today i had bought some cheaper TIM (Stars 66G) which had been the cheapest in the store (<0.65W/mK), I had wiped off the old zalman TIM with alcohol, and I had applied the cheaper TIM as flat as possible with my ID card.
My temps were: Unknown for stock clock (decided to OC straight away so the grease would settle in)
but it had idled at 24'C and loaded at 50'C OCed @ 3.255ghz stock voltage and multipier, FSB at 210(x15.5).
Last edited: