A 500Mhz system shouldnt be doing video encoding at all ... results are just too unpredictablebut you need a pretty fast computer to use it, I was able to bearly use it on a 500 Mhz computer
Eeeeeeeeeek! MPEG2 is rated at 480x480/480x576 @ 29.97/25 Hz with a bitrate of ~2536Kbit/s (unless you want to get into MPEG2-DVD which is a totally different ballgame and your 233 would be seriously outclassed to keep up with even 4Mbit/sec) at a bitrate.Yeah, but after the capture you could easily convert the MPEG2 into MPEG4.
1. On a 233Mhz CPU? Anything outside of 10seconds is up for grabsMy card captures by default on 720x576 (8MBit/sec) with 48.000 kHz 16 bit audio. Who could ask for more?
If you think that its done 100% on the card you're in for a treat. Try chewing up your comp doing something else, say Doom3 or Premier encoding and you'll see. It'll be doubly obvious on a 233Mhz system. Regardless, it's not feasible to be doing high calibre encoding on the fly on a 233Mhz system!That's MPEG2-DVD, but it's coded in the card, so no hassle for the CPU.
I dont either but it's just a side point (considering HDTV goes up to 1920xsomething i think).1280x1024 capture? From what? I don't have HDTV - the PAL signal is only 720x576, so why should I capture it at 1280x1024?