Western Digital Raptor vs. Velociraptor?

[EGS]

Hello.

I'm reading that both models are 10k RPM, but supposedly the velociraptor series are faster? How can this be at the same RPM speeds? What makes it different and better, how/why?

Please explain, thank you in advance.

 

[mac550]

dont quote me on it but i think the head can move faster and it can read data faster than a normal raptor

 

[WhiteFireDragon]

velociraptors have the same cache and RPM as old raptors, but they're overall faster, consume less power, and quieter, and does not put out as much heat compared to regular raptors. this is mainly because of newer technology and denser platters, so they're able to fit them in a 2.5" form factor instead of the normal 3.5". here's a few benchmarks of normal raptors compared to my own data on the VR's:

regular raptors in single

regular raptor in 2x RAID-0

velociraptor in single

velociraptor in 2x RAID-0

 

[Cromewell]

this is mainly because of newer technology and denser platters

That's pretty much all there is to it. They are faster because they hold the same capacity but on a much smaller platter. There's a few other things on them as well that make them faster in certain usage situations but they have no where near the same performance change as the platters.

 

[EGS]

Is it true that lower capacity (ie, smaller hard drive) VelociRaptors are faster than the higher capacity ones? If so, how is that possible? I thought they'd be the same speed...but the bigger the hard drive, the slower it is?

 

[Cromewell]

Is it true that lower capacity (ie, smaller hard drive) VelociRaptors are faster than the higher capacity ones? If so, how is that possible? I thought they'd be the same speed...but the bigger the hard drive, the slower it is?

If you have 2 identicle drives (same # of platters, same RPM, etc) except 1 is 100GB and one is 200GB the 200GB drive is faster.

If you have 2 identicle drives except one is 2.5" and the other is 3.5" the 2.5" drive is faster. This is the same concept as the 100GB vs 200GB example.

 

[EGS]

Did you mean the 100GB would be faster ?...

 

[Cromewell]

No.

 

[EGS]

I was reading the lower capacity VelociRaptors are faster than the higher capacity ones though...?

 

[Cromewell]

Where did you see that? It may be true but then all else is not equal, something on the smaller drive is making up for lost density

 

[WhiteFireDragon]

If you have 2 identicle drives (same # of platters, same RPM, etc) except 1 is 100GB and one is 200GB the 200GB drive is faster.

If you have 2 identicle drives except one is 2.5" and the other is 3.5" the 2.5" drive is faster. This is the same concept as the 100GB vs 200GB example.

i dont think that's true. the same family of drives but having different capacities means there are just less platters, but the density on each platter is still the same. for example, if you compare a 300gb VR to a 150gb VR, the 300gb one has two platters of 75gb on both sides of each platter, where as the 150gb one only has one platter (75gb on each side). if you look at all WD hard drives (not just raptors and VR's), this is how they've always done it.

 

[Cromewell]

If you are just adding platters you are right, it doesn't get any faster. I wasn't using any real drive for my example. Like I said, if all else is equal and only the capacity changes (denser platters not more of them), the higher capacity drive is faster.

 

[WhiteFireDragon]

ah i get what you're saying too. comparing a 3.5" raptor with a 2.5" raptor both with 150gb would mean the 2.5" would be faster due to denser platter.

i think OP was asking about the same family of drives though, comparing only the capacity in velociraptors.