mainly gaming. I like to play all my games on maxed out settings, and when I got crisis 3 and couldn't up the AA settings to max, well, I realized that I need to either get another 670 4 gig card or sell it and get 2 x 760's. I say 4 gig of vram, because when I am playing crisis 3 now, my vram will get up to 2.9gigs on the 670 I have, so ill be sticking with 4 gigs of vram on my cards, since future games coming out over the next year or 2 will more than likely be using more and more of it. im just looking to get a sli setup to last me the next 2 years, then sell the qhole pc and start form scratch again.
ive been real tempted to break down and get another 670. right now im using the evga FTW+ gtx 670 4 gig card, and they go for $460. I went out and bought 2 x 760's from best buy (2 gig versions), to just try out (since I can return them within 14 days) and they seem to run pretty well. the 2 gigs on them get maxed out with crisis 3 though, but since im going to bew getting the 4 gig cards, that issue is non existant.
still don't know which way to go though. I agree, that the 760 seems to perform almost onpar with the 670, when I run just one of the 760's in comparison to the 670. I did some benchmarking between the 2.
3dmark 11 xtreme settings
670=3235...760=3038...760 sli=5519
3dmark firestrike
670=6059...760=5760...760 sli=9080
heaven
670=1155...760=1060...760 sli=2030
valley
670=1763...760=1675...760 sli=3125
seems like the 760's in sli scale at about 92%. im wondering if the 670 would scale any better in sli?
if I went with the 670, it cost is $460 out of pocket, since I already have one. if I go with the 760's, id sell the 670 I currently have for $250, bringing cost down to $385 out of pocket.
should I spend the $75 extra and go for the 670, or save the extra money and shoot for the 760's by msi.
thanks again for any other suggstions.