Which Is Better

G

Gambino23

New Member
Im Looking for a intel processor and have two in mind but im wondering which is betta to get a 3.0ghz are a 3.06ghz just wondering let me no what yall think:confused:
 
Depends on the actual cpu...if your comparing a 3.06Ghz pentium 4 to say, a 3Ghz core 2 duo the core 2 duo kills it.
 
Depends, are both dual cores, quad cores, what? and depends what series of processor it is. Saying they were both C2D's 3.06 is going to be better than 3.0. But then you gotta factor in things such as price etc. also.
 
Last edited:
Gambino23 said:
Im Looking for a intel processor and have two in mind but im wondering which is betta to get a 3.0ghz are a 3.06ghz just wondering let me no what yall think:confused:
Click to expand...

Unless you mean 3.60ghz you're going to notice nothing. A 6mhz difference will be difficult to tell between the two. However, different processors offer different technology and sometimes the calculated speed of the processor can only mean a fraction in how well the processor performs. Which processors, in general, were you browsing. Dual core. Quad core...
 
KevinKevin said:
Unless you mean 3.60ghz you're going to notice nothing. A 6mhz difference will be difficult to tell between the two. However, different processors offer different technology and sometimes the calculated speed of the processor can only mean a fraction in how well the processor performs. Which processors, in general, were you browsing. Dual core. Quad core...
Click to expand...
That actually is a 60mhz difference, not 6mhz.
 
bomberboysk said:
That actually is a 60mhz difference, not 6mhz.
Click to expand...

I'm not an expert in all this kinda thing, but 100mhz correlates to 1ghz right? If so, he said 6.06ghz. The 6 on the right is 6mhz? Well anyway, that 6 on the right would mean no different at all in computer performance. That's all I'm trying to say. Depending on which processor you're choosing from, which technology is involved in a processor, speed can only mean a fraction to how well the actual processor performs.
 
KevinKevin said:
I'm not an expert in all this kinda thing, but 100mhz correlates to 1ghz right? If so, he said 6.06ghz. The 6 on the right is 6mhz? Well anyway, that 6 on the right would mean no different at all in computer performance. That's all I'm trying to say. Depending on which processor you're choosing from, which technology is involved in a processor, speed can only mean a fraction to how well the actual processor performs.
Click to expand...

No, 1000MHz = 1GHz, so 3.06GHz = 3060MHz, but you wouldnt notice a 60MHz difference

Kilo = 1000
Mega = 1000 Kilo
Giga = 1000 Mega

Applies to megabytes and megahertz, among other things, of course for storage there's the 1000 system AND the binary 1024 system
 
I think he's talking about the E6850, Conroe 65NM 4MB cache 1333MT/s FSB vs. the E7600 Wolfdale-3M 3MB cache 1066MT/s FSB

The E6850 should be a bit faster then the E7600 but the E7600 should output less heat being 45NM

Of course, an E8400 would beat both of those but cost more
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top