PC Technology INC.
banned
That's weird. How come Office 2003 can install on 2000 and not on ME?
Windows ME
- Thread starter PC Technology INC.
- Start date
PC Technology INC.
banned
That's the first time I run this OS on my computer and never crashed as I know
SFR
Truth fears no questions
irsmart said:ME isn't so reliable, but I think it is t least better than the old 3.1 or DOS
I fell in LOVE with 3.11 (and how was DOS 6.22 not reliable?0 anyway.... then 95 came out and I couldnt stand it.. 98 wasnt much better but ME took 10 steps backwards.... 95/98/ME were kind of like placeholders while Microsoft worked on NT.. and I would never even consider using NT... maybe NT 4.0... if I had the time to waste on getting the drivers to work..
and to answer the irrevocably banned PC Technology INC. brilliant question with an equally intelligent answer: ME sucks, 2000 doesnt.
mgoldb2
VIP Member
SFR said:
Same here on my 486 my parents had 10 years or more ago I used to use pretty much dos and only dos. It had window 3.2 on it but I could not stand using it. Then windows 95 was install and I also could not stand using windows. Finally when I got my own computer I gave up on dos and started using windows 98 which I did not like. I used windows 98 until I upgraded to windows 2000. Windows 2000 is the first windows I acturally liked. during this time I had plenty of friends with ME and they was having problems with it pretty much always. I swear microsoft spent a total of one micro secound testing windows me for bugs. I finally started using xp pro when I built my gamming computer.
