Vista Rating

Update :after I upgraded:

Procesor: 5.1
RAM: 5.2
Grapics: 4.7
Gaming graphics: 4.2
HDD: 5.4

Now, thanks to vista, i know what i need to upgrade.
 
My E8400 system only gets a 5.8 because it doesn't consider a C2D CPU @ 4.2 GHz powerful enough. Both of my Q6600 machines @ 3.6 GHz get 5.9 across the board.

Just another reason for me sticking with XP Pro.

The only system I currently have running on Vista is my laptop, which scores:

Processor: 4.2
Memory: 4.4
Graphics: 4.0
Gaming Graphics: 2.7
Hard Drive: 5.2
 
Last edited:
q6600@3,2ghz 5.9
ballistix 1066mhz 5.9
gainward 4850 5.9
gaming graphics 5.9
my raptor 10,000rpm 16mb cach gets 5.7 (bit gutted my raptor is the let down)
 
Processor: 5.4
Memory: 5.9
Graphics: 5.9
Gaming Graphics: 5.9
Hard Drive: 5.5

oc'ing my 5000+ gets me +.2 in my score not much but i'll take it, considering it is an amd :/
 
i dont think i've ever posted in this thread, so mine is as follows:

processor-5.6
memory-5.6
graphics-5.9
gaming graphics-5.9
primary hard disk-5.6


i dont understand why my processor and ram arent higher though. i mean, right this moment my ram is clocked to 1066mhz at 5-5-5-18 and it only scores a 5.6 wtf? idk if my processor should be higher, but 3ghz should warrant a 5.9 no?
 
Nope, 3GHz dual core will not bring in a 5.9.

For RAM, is it dual-channel? I find its got a lot to do with the motherboard.
 
I really hate my score :(

VistaScore.jpg



:D
 
I just installed vista the other day.

Here it is:

vistascores.jpg


If i had a better graphics card, that might be better :P
 
Last edited:
[-0MEGA-];1051519 said:
haha! Please don't :(

It's funny how our 750GB HD's with the 32MB cache get 5.9 for the HD score, where as the Raptors get 5.7.
Click to expand...

how is that? if we bench tested ours mine would be the quicker drive-does it go on capacity aswell?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top