But the 660Ti has PhysX![]()
If he has an ok cpu the physX will help almost nothing...
And I'm speaking of the total performance, so physX included.
There are only some games where you can see the difference with physX and even difficult to find then. It looks as nice with no physX, just my opinion.![]()
Thats not completely true, a physx enabled game will perform massively better with a CUDA GPU, but very few games are in existence so im not sure its a selling factor.
BUT, the driver support on nvidia is superior by far.
+1 thats one reason why HD 8000 series are releasing Q2 2013.nvidia are a massive corporation, ati/amd are losing money hand-over-fist.
nvidia drivers have been significantly better for a long time, and will be for the forseeable future. totally a point, because in 12 months from now you'll get a 20% benefit over the amd/ati driver with the latest game, proven time and time again...
^
computers are systems and are only as good as the weakest link![]()
nice answering the question.
Yeah, it's a good chip.
You cannot answer that question without understanding the system champ.
Its not a good chip with 1GB of ram and a base model gpu.
all he said was "would you classify it as a good CPU".
Not "how do you think this would go in my system", or similar.