I find PS and GIMP are about the same. GIMP is slightly more convoluted to use.
In short, they are complicated because of what they can do. What are you trying to do? Is there a particular feature you need and don't care about the rest?
GIMP has good features, but it doesn't compare to Photoshop. Their RAW editor and content awareness when using fill and object removal are two of my most commonly used features of PS.
I didn't mean that GIMP can't edit them, but that I much prefer the layout and capability of PS's RAW editing compared to GIMP.Which Gimp also has... UFRaw is an add-on for Gimp I use as a standalone software for RAW editing...
I didn't mean that GIMP can't edit them, but that I much prefer the layout and capability of PS's RAW editing compared to GIMP.
2. But both GIMP and Photoshop are too difficult to use, is there any simpler and free alternative to these twos? Except Ms Paint
Just found that Photoshop charges monthly for individuals, it's not a reasonable choice for me.
how many of you guy continuously subscribes to Photoshop????
Is there any free version for older version of PS? I guess PS has already existed for a long long time.
I do and currently pay $19.99/mo with the education discount.how many of you guy continuously subscribes to Photoshop????
Is there any free version for older version of PS? I guess PS has already existed for a long long time.
Hi, I can't specify what I will do now with a photo software at the moment but Ms Paint is certainly not enough for me and Photoshop/ GIMP is probably too much to be effective