Hi, I sent you a private message. I'd like to try to help you gain some knowledge so you don't keep making the kinds of mistakes you keep posting about in forums here.
You NEVER, EVER want to go backwards when you "upgrade". Going from an AMD 8XX chipset to a 7XX chipset is definitely a downgrade. While older AMD chipsets may support later CPUs, you are much better off buying the chipset that came out with the CPU in question, or a later chipset.
For AMD FX that would be the 9XX chipsets such as 970 and 990.
Honestly though, AMD FX processors are quite terrible. They are 2010 technology that was delayed until 2011 and really haven't improved much despite a bit of a design overhaul from Bulldozer (X1XX) to piledriver (X3XX) CPUs. You would likely have been much better served with a more modern setup like a Haswell or Skylake i3/i5, or at very least, an AMD FM2+ solution such as an A10 or Athlon 860K (if you have discrete video).
FX is SO bad, that when it came out, the IPC (instructions per clock) performance was, per core, inferior (significantly at that) to the considerably ancient Thuban architecture of the Phenom II 6 cores. That's not an improvement, that's a joke. That's putting out a product that you know sucks and didn't live up to internal expectations because if you don't sell it you will see a huge financial loss for your company.
ALL FX processors are overclockable, so swapping your CPU out was really silly. Not that 400ish MHZ makes a difference that is worth while anyways, but you could have put 400Mhz on your old CPU no problem.
Things are not what they appear on the surface with computer hardware. Often something better can be done for less money, or can be done MUCH better for the same amount of money. In some cases you can make something better for free. Ask first. That's what the internet is for.
I realize you are at the computer enthusiast "entry level" of screwing around and seeing what does what but that need not be a financially wasteful endeavor.