koOp New Member Aug 21, 2006 #1 hay wats better having 2x 150gb or getting a 300gb and splitting them up?
Geoff VIP Member Aug 21, 2006 #2 In the even that a hard drive should fail, if you had 2x150GB, then half of your data would still be intact. But if I were you, I would get the 300GB since one larger drive is usually cheaper then two smaller drives.
In the even that a hard drive should fail, if you had 2x150GB, then half of your data would still be intact. But if I were you, I would get the 300GB since one larger drive is usually cheaper then two smaller drives.
Maddhatter New Member Aug 21, 2006 #4 i prefer having 2 drives...i hate partitions i always mess them up and end up losing several GBs of space
i prefer having 2 drives...i hate partitions i always mess them up and end up losing several GBs of space
Burgerbob Active Member Aug 22, 2006 #6 koOp said: cant u jst install windows service pack 2? and that shud fix it? Click to expand... ^^^ ???? I would get two drives, that just seems to work better.
koOp said: cant u jst install windows service pack 2? and that shud fix it? Click to expand... ^^^ ???? I would get two drives, that just seems to work better.
P paga banned Aug 22, 2006 #8 Just another view i'm having 3 partitions(in spite of i had to buy software ) 1) for programs files. 2) windows 3) backups (it makes me fill safe). that works really great.
Just another view i'm having 3 partitions(in spite of i had to buy software ) 1) for programs files. 2) windows 3) backups (it makes me fill safe). that works really great.