pdc76
New Member
according to maximumpc magazine, nvidia released the geforce fx5800 to compete against ati's radeon 9700. ati's card made it to market first, and racked up several favorable reviews.
early benchmarks of the 5800 were promising: 3dmark03 scores were impressive, and nvidia promptly declared victory over the 9700.
soon after, the truth was out. nvidia had "cooked it's drivers to reduce detail and even prevent parts of the benchmark from being rendered". nvidia called the tweaks "optimizations", but when they were removed, the 5800's performance was nowhere near that of ati's 9700.
later benchmarks would prove this finding.
how can we trust them after they did that? i'm sticking with ati.
source:
maximumpc
october 2006
volume 11, no 10
pg 53
early benchmarks of the 5800 were promising: 3dmark03 scores were impressive, and nvidia promptly declared victory over the 9700.
soon after, the truth was out. nvidia had "cooked it's drivers to reduce detail and even prevent parts of the benchmark from being rendered". nvidia called the tweaks "optimizations", but when they were removed, the 5800's performance was nowhere near that of ati's 9700.
later benchmarks would prove this finding.
how can we trust them after they did that? i'm sticking with ati.
source:
maximumpc
october 2006
volume 11, no 10
pg 53