I can go on and on and on, but I think blu ray is just plain out going to fail considering its high cost and high requirements. Plus if you play back a movie on blu ray and HD DVD side by side, do you really think most consumers are going to be able to physically tell the difference?
The only plus side I see is, if you buy a series DVD. Lets say the Sopranos for example, will now have a whole season on one blu ray disc. However, that is really more of a convienence thing and not a feature.
It depends on who wins the console war. If the PS3 with its blu-ray player comes out on top, it'll probably be blu ray. If the 360 wins, it'll be HD-DVD. If they do equally well, it'll be HD-DVD for the reasons mentioned above.
Dual Layer Blu Ray disc holds 50gig of data. You are telling me a DVD movie is going to use all 50gigs of data?
I don't think that is right.
Not really considering the 360 has a regular DVD drive and the upgrade kit for a HDDVD drice is $200, I don't know how many people are going to jump on board.
I go to the hometheaterforums.com these guys know their stuff most of them agree hd-dvd is better than bluray and alot of them own both go and read up...
How will vista have support for either? That's like plugging in an ATI video card versus an Nvidia video card, why does vista care what it is?so we'll see what windows vista will have built in support for. maybe both you never know.
Dual Layer Blu Ray disc holds 50gig of data. You are telling me a DVD movie is going to use all 50gigs of data?
I don't think that is right. However, you put a whole series from TV in HD it might take up that much space. Just compare it to HD DVR recordings from cable. Your average one hour tv show, w/ commercials is just under 1 gig, or just at one gig. that means 1 blu ray disc could easily hold up to approximately 50 episodes at that rate.
I think its complete over kill and the market doesn't need that type of technology. HD DVD will be cheaper, and will fit both the industries and the consumers needs.