22" Widescreen for $289

In a way yes, I hear what you are saying.. But when you see the contrasts and colors you would wonder why you didn't buy one sooner. Acer is a little more, how do you say, less distinct? Everything dark blends in together?? For lack of a better way of putting it. The colors are a little less rich and vibrant and the picture is a tad more "pixelated".

My description isn't exactly the best, but then again I'm not a monitor reviewer either for obvious reasons. But they do function quite well for what they are and if you can look past the small faults I hasten to say that they are worth the money.
 
SirKenin said:
In a way yes, I hear what you are saying.. But when you see the contrasts and colors you would wonder why you didn't buy one sooner. Acer is a little more, how do you say, less distinct? Everything dark blends in together?? For lack of a better way of putting it. The colors are a little less rich and vibrant and the picture is a tad more "pixelated".

My description isn't exactly the best, but then again I'm not a monitor reviewer either for obvious reasons. But they do function quite well for what they are and if you can look past the small faults I hasten to say that they are worth the money.
Click to expand...

Well the monitor I have now only has 500:1 contrast, and 300cd/m2 brightness. The Acer has 700:1 contrast, and the same brightness. So it would probably seem more vibrant to me anyways.
 
It would certainly be easier on the eyes, that's for sure. I dunno. Mine were ok. I just like this LG 100 times better, but it's almost $100 more, which is unfortunate.
 
Nice!

$60 is good for something with that price. If I hadn't just bought a 19" last year I'd get it, but mine is too new to replace already.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top