(Very) Cheap Upgrade

bigsaucybob

New Member
I want to be able to do on-the-fly burning with my two DVD burners. Right now they are going through a single IDE cable, so it is not possible.

I need a:

-Motherboard: LGA 775, PCI-E, obviously 2 IDE, 2 SATA

-Case: Something cool

-HSF

I want to spend under $200.

1. The reason I can't do on-the-fly is becasue im using a single IDE, right?

2. WIll I able to get all this for under my price range?

3. Would I be better off getting a PCI card that allows for more IDE ports, would that allow for on-the-fly?

Thanks.
 
As far as I know, you can do on the fly burning with a single IDE connector. You will be able to fit all three into a $200 budget, but your best option is to spend more money on the motherboard and then wait to buy a new case and HSF.
 
As far as I know, you can do on the fly burning with a single IDE connector.

Please elaborate. The program I have been using does not allow for it.

You will be able to fit all three into a $200 budget, but your best option is to spend more money on the motherboard and then wait to buy a new case and HSF.

I was thinking the same thing, but I definitely dont need some awesome mobo or watever. I would rather spend more on the mobo and less on the case or HSF.
 
I read some more about on the fly burning...it's possible to use only one ide channel, but highly unrecommended, as it decreases efficiency.

I suppose for your needs and price range, this is your best option for a motherboard: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16813131142

The next thing you want to upgrade is the HSF, and lastly the case, which you may want to hold off and save up more for a case. I'm not too educated in the field of HSF's, so I'll let someone else recommend one.
 
I read some more about on the fly burning...it's possible to use only one ide channel, but highly unrecommended, as it decreases efficiency.

I suppose for your needs and price range, this is your best option for a motherboard: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16813131142

The next thing you want to upgrade is the HSF, and lastly the case, which you may want to hold off and save up more for a case. I'm not too educated in the field of HSF's, so I'll let someone else recommend one.

That is a really nice motherboard, I was thinking about spending around $100 on the motherboard. Enough to get a nice looking case and HSF. Unless I can include that mobo and a decent case and HSF.
 
copying straight to the other disc instead of making an image to the hdd first. NOT RECCOMENDED if your computer's ancient.
 
I want to be able to do on-the-fly burning with my two DVD burners. Right now they are going through a single IDE cable, so it is not possible.
You cant do it only if you're burning fast -- which is a bad idea to start with.

I want to spend under $200.
Why dont you just buy a controller card for a lot less?

The reason I can't do on-the-fly is becasue im using a single IDE, right?
Well that depends on the connectors the optical drives use but more likely the answer if you're burning fast

3. Would I be better off getting a PCI card that allows for more IDE ports, would that allow for on-the-fly?
The addin card is more cost effecxtive

As far as I know, you can do on the fly burning with a single IDE connector
Sure you can but you'll get even worse results than on the fly with two :)

Please elaborate. The program I have been using does not allow for it.
Sure it does. The problem is you wont be able to sustain multiple high speed random yet semisequential reads across the drives

I read some more about on the fly burning...it's possible to use only one ide channel, but highly unrecommended, as it decreases efficiency.
Well efficiency isnt so much an issue, that just means its a bit slower, whoppee... what should be a big deal is the higher disc error rates.

Do they make PCI cards with more IDA/PATA ports?
Would that allow for on-the-fly burning?
Yes

copying straight to the other disc instead of making an image to the hdd first. NOT RECCOMENDED if your computer's ancient.
Or if you want to keep our C2/P1 error rates down
 
Back
Top