Lower is better. The timings are wait times in clock cycles for a given operation.
so that would be 4-4-4-12 and 4-4-4-15 ?
I don't see a 4-4-4-15. But if there is yes.
Here's the order.
4-4-4-12
5-5-5-12
5-5-5-15
6-6-6-18
Lower is better for timings. So yes, 4-4-4-12 is better then 5-5-5-12. But that only applies if your talking about the same speed RAM.im sorry i mean 555 12
This is true, I was just talking in general terms, I guess I made the mistake of assuming same speed is assumed.Lower is better for timings. So yes, 4-4-4-12 is better then 5-5-5-12. But that only applies if your talking about the same speed RAM.
If your comparing DDR2 667 @ 4-4-4-12 to DDR2 800 @ 5-5-5-12, thats different.