Hi
When i oc'd my cpu to about 3.865 ghz, i ran prime 95 and i noticed worker 2 (on physical core 1) was working like 10 times slower then the other ones.
Is this maybe because windows vista tries to lock the working programs to 1 core when the others are fully used by prime ( in this case)?
When i put the settings back to default, this was again the case but a lot much noticeable ( but this time on core nr 2 of 3), and it ran on a much lower temp then other 3.
So does vista lock working programs who doesn't need much cpu to 1 core causing 1 worker on prime 95 to slow down, or is it because i have a bad cpu.
Thx boonet
specs
P5Q pro
q9550 @ 3.865
8 gigs dominator
750 w corsair psu
eah 4870X2
some hdds
scythe mugen 2
antec 1200
When i oc'd my cpu to about 3.865 ghz, i ran prime 95 and i noticed worker 2 (on physical core 1) was working like 10 times slower then the other ones.
Is this maybe because windows vista tries to lock the working programs to 1 core when the others are fully used by prime ( in this case)?
When i put the settings back to default, this was again the case but a lot much noticeable ( but this time on core nr 2 of 3), and it ran on a much lower temp then other 3.
So does vista lock working programs who doesn't need much cpu to 1 core causing 1 worker on prime 95 to slow down, or is it because i have a bad cpu.
Thx boonet
specs
P5Q pro
q9550 @ 3.865
8 gigs dominator
750 w corsair psu
eah 4870X2
some hdds
scythe mugen 2
antec 1200