3gbps / 6gbps?

gr82bthe1st

New Member
Hi everyone.

I was just wondering how much difference the different speeds make to a mechanical hdd?

Is it a noticeable difference?

I have a seagate barracuda 7200rpm sata 3 hdd which I want to put to 3gbps so that I free up a 6gbps sata slot for another ssd.

Thanks for your help in advance.
 
For a single hard drive a 3Gbps connection is more then what a single drive can utilize.
 
SATA1 = 1.5Gbps (1.5Gbps is about 192MB/s with no overheads)
SATA2 = 3.0Gbps (3.0Gbps is about 384MB/s with no overheads)
SATA3 = 6.0Gbps (6.0Gbps is about 768MB/s with no overheads)

Most modern mechanical HDD's will be limited by old SATA1 ports. You will want SATA2 at minimum. For SSD's with any good speeds, a SATA3 port will be a necessity for full speed.
 
Last edited:
that makes it 178MB/s.
1,500,000,000/8=187,500,000 bytes
187,500,000/1024=183,105 KB
183,105/1024=178.81 MB

Either way, your not going to see a big difference between 3Gb/s and 1.5Gb/s with a mechanical drive
 
Thanks for all the helpful replies.

I will be placing an order for a OCZ Vertex 3 at the end of the month when I get paid :D
 
Gigabytes per second
Per gigabyte (GB/s or GBps) is the following three type with equal a data rate units:
1000000000 megabits per second
1 billion megabits per second
1 billion megabits per second
8 binary auspicious bits per second
g.gif
 
6 gigabit/s is faster than 3 gigabit/s. It is just like GHz.

No it isn't, and even GHz doesn't mean faster.

When we talk about Gb/s we are talking about either bandwidth or a marketing term for compatibility. When you see a hard drive that says SATA 3.0, that doesn't mean it will run at SATA 3.0 speeds, it means it is compatible with SATA 3.0, however what looks better to someone purchasing a drive with no knowledge of what it means - SATA 2 or SATA 3? All that the bandwidth dictates is the maximum amount of data that can go through that port at any one time.

Consider two hose pipes, one that can have up to 2 litres of water per minute put through it and one that can have 3 litres per minute. If you had the 2 litre pipe running at capacity, so every minute 2 litres of water is coming out of it, but then the same amount coming from the 3 litre per second pipe, they are still having the water flow at the same rate, 2 litres per minute, even though you could put more water through the larger pipe in the same amount of time, up to 3 litres per second.

This is true for the SATA 2.0 vs SATA 3.0 as well, just because the SATA 3.0 with 6Gb/s bandwidth can run at 6Gb/s, doesn't mean it will, the speed of the drive along with the maximum bandwidth of the port will dictate that. Which ever the lower of the two is will be the deciding factor. If you have a hard drive that has a maximum throughput of 2Gb/s, it will perform the same on a SATA 2.0 port as it does on a STA 3.0 port, because the port is not running at capacity, even with SATA 2.0 having a lower maximum bandwidth.


For what you said about GHz, higher clock speed doesn't mean higher performance. For the same family of chip, for instance taking a 3.2GHz Sandy Bridge i5 vs a 3.4GHz Sandy Bridge i5, the 3.4GHz will be faster as they are both on the same architecture. Take a 3.0GHz Pentium 4 though and compare it to a 3.0GHz i5, and the i5 will win out, even in single threaded applications where the additional cores don't work to the processors advantage.

This is due to other factors in the architecture, for instance transistor count, the layout of components, cache size, cache speed etc.

Across families the only way to determine if CPU A is faster than CPU B is to run unbiased benchmarks and look at the numbers that are produced.
 
Back
Top