90nm 3500+ vs. 754 3200+ ?

R

runbird05

New Member
While looking through some Athlon 64's, I was wondering what and how great are the advantages of spending around $100 more to get a socket 939 90nm 3500+ as opposed to the socket 754 3200+, both operating at 2.2Ghz and with the same cache sizes.

I'm assuming the 3500+ runs cooler and allows better overclocks, but I'd think there would be other benefits too.

Thanks for any answers.
 
Last edited:
Correct the S754s lack dual channel and lack the extra multiplier on the HTL. I dont really see any competition to the S939-3500 from the S754-3200 ... for $100 thats handsdown worth it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top