AMD 3200+ or 3500+ (Venice)

[rox1co]

i keep hearing about how good the 3500+ is

but it's pretty expensive, and i hear Venice is a good Core to OC

so would it hurt to get the 3200+ if i were to get a SLI Mobo w/ 2x6600GT or 2x6800GT

i plan on getting a 17"/19" (8ms) Monitor (and i plan on maxing out my resolution)

ah, help me out on this. i'm going insane

 

[XHotxEx791]

2 6800gt is the best to get. 26600gt doesn't even beat a single 6800gt. 3200 is better. 3500 not worth it, if you're willing to get a 3500, get a 3700+ san diego instead.
Roger

 

[Praetor]

26600gt doesn't even beat a single 6800gt

Yer right, 2x6600GT beats a 6800Ultra

3200 is better. 3500 not worth it, if you're willing to get a 3500, get a 3700+ san diego instead.

I dunno where you're from (information wise) but a 3200 is not better than a 3500

 

[XHotxEx791]

3200 is better value wise..

 

[apj101]

3200 is better. 3500 not worth it, if you're willing to get a 3500, get a 3700+ san diego instead.

impecable reverse logic ????

anyway, your best choice bank for buck wise is to get the 3200+(venice core if you intend to overclock) the performance difference between the 2 is not sufficient to justifice the price difference

 

[Archangel]

2 6800gt is the best to get. 26600gt doesn't even beat a single 6800gt.

I have read that on som ote peviews o. but i guess its also moterboard related

 

[Praetor]

I have read that on som ote peviews o. but i guess its also moterboard related

Yes and some reviews are dumb