AMD Or Pentium?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Adam Warren

New Member
i have a pentium 4 with h/t 3.20 ghz. and i am pleased, i was going to get an amd fx, but i never, which is better?
 
Adam Warren said:
i have a pentium 4 with h/t 3.20 ghz. and i am pleased, i was going to get an amd fx, but i never, which is better?

Which FX? The FX-57 is the best processor in the world, and the FX-55 is second. But they are amazingly expensive, though.

BTW, you can't put one of those in an intel board, fyi:D
 
lol obviously any cpu with double the ammount of piplines would take just a 32 bit "ordinary" cpu
there is only 1 pipeline (it splits but it rejoins before the end) as for the rest I don't quite understand what you're saying...
 
The FX-57 is the best processor in the world, and the FX-55 is second.
Where the hell do you pull your information from?? Perhaps you should have a look:
http://www.amd.com/us-en/
http://forums.amd.com/index.php?showtopic=34248&st=0&#entry335892
http://www.c627627.com/AMD/Athlon64/ (couple things off but mostly good)
http://freespace.virgin.net/m.warner/RoadmapQ205.htm

They have them for laptops?
No. Does it matter?

I'm guessing he meant that for commercially available desktop CPUs (ie no supercomputers, prototypes or anything)
You're not suggesting Opteron and Xeon rigs are not commercially available are you? ;)

fx-57 will eat p4 for breakfast
LOL the silliness ensues .... *when will people quit talking crap -- the goddamn processor doesnt even exist yet*

Would the FX-53?
Would the FX53 what?

lol obviously any cpu with double the ammount of piplines would take just a 32 bit "ordinary" cpu
Pipelines?? No CPU, from revision to revision, even between AMD and Intel has double the pipelines of a related comparable chip. Period.


*Steps back and looks at all the posts*
....
*WOW*


In either case, in light of all the wrong information here, and the overlapping coverage, have a look at http://www.computerforum.com/showthread.php?t=4346
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top