AMD Quad FX is out!

SirKenin said:
Yeah. Dr. Tom Pabst the dentist. AKA Tom's Hardware. Another site to avoid at all costs (although every once in a blue moon I do link to a HDD article or two from there).
Click to expand...

:DIts hard to find a non bias site anymore
 
Last edited:
god I think its about time amd techician put some seriouse efford on their new processor. this one cant even compare with 6700. man I must get intel next years. amd just disappointed me too much.
 
Stop with all the bad talk about AMD guys. I seriously think this might be a smart move by them. I mean this is setting the basis for their new agena cpu next year. We see good results from Quad FX other than heat disipation didn't we? Remember Amd has been using k8 since who knows when. I say that is pretty good from something that old. When they come out with the new agena cpu and barceleno (don't quote me on the names) you might actually see some real results. Also, you might see octo-core first from amd because of 2 quad's implemented into 4x4. Yes, I know is this reasonable? Maybe not but was quad core necessary either? Competition is what we all need and this is good for us. (the consumer) Also, the fx-70 for $599 might actually be nice. But reasonable? No. Maybe Amd knew they wouldn't have something HUGE off of this but they were just setting some things up for their future roadmap.
 
Last edited:
holyjunk said:
Stop with all the bad talk about AMD guys. I seriously think this might be a smart move by them. I mean this is setting the basis for their new agena cpu next year. We say good results from Quad FX other than heat disipation didn't we? Remember Amd has been using k8 since who knows when. I saw that is pretty good from something that old. When they come out with the new agena cpu and barceleno (don't quote me on the names) you might actually see some real results. Also, you might see octo-core first from amd because of 2 quad's implemented into 4x4. Yes, I know is this reasonable? Maybe not but was quad core necessary either? Competition is what we all need and this is good for us. (the consumer) Also, the fx-70 for $599 might actually be nice. But reasonable? No. Maybe Amd knew they wouldn't have something HUGE off of this but they were just setting some things up for their future roadmap.
Click to expand...

lets hope tho. I'm going to get another comp next year, by then I really hope amd can pull off something that can own c2d. Cause I really like amd as well. amd to me is like apple in software world. They are the one who stood up against the monster microsoft.
 
You must own Vista Ultimate edition to get maximum performance from quad FX. Athlon FX62 still more powerful than 2 Quad FX CPU in most of modern applications and games.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top