Anti-Virus For Windows 2003 Server

cohen said:
hhmmm... AVG 8.0??? But otherwise pay for Nod32
Click to expand...
Not too keen on AVG myself- I would suggest BitDefender, seems less "heavy" than AVG but to be honest if the PC you are protecting is valuble in way of data- then I would definately go for a paid AV such as PANDA(the version without F/WALL) as I have had NO issues in 5 years using Panda and it comes with 3 liciences at a very reasonable price(under£20);)
 
sg1 said:
AHH:eek: He said the N word!!
System heavy,low detection rate,pop up city AV:eek:

I'd rather use Kapersky or Macafee than Norton!!
Click to expand...


Do u refer to Kapersky and Macafee as being not very good antivirus??? Im asking because ive heard that they are quite good.... :confused::confused:

-Silver
 
I have had this conversation over and over again , so I'm just going to say" Each to their own" you all know what works for you and I know what works for me and my customers know what I recommend and they're happy so....... Live and let live :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top