Any good for gaming?

Kornowski

VIP Member
Hey,

Do you guys know if a Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 2 x 1.86Ghz would be any good for gaming... I know the E6600 is but there's no way I can afford it... Would this do the job?

Thanks for the help, Danny :)
 
Hey,

Do you guys know if a Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 2 x 1.86Ghz would be any good for gaming... I know the E6600 is but there's no way I can afford it... Would this do the job?

Thanks for the help, Danny :)

Yes it would. Even being 1.8ghz it still beats AMD. That one i think the FX-62 can actually beat by a small margin, but OC it and youll surpass the FX by far.
 
I won't be overclocking it I don't think... Will it improve my games then, so I'll be able to have the settings higher?
 
yes dont expect to surpass by very far if you have a large bottleneck in your system, because your computer is only as good as its worst part. so if you had a qx6700, and an x700pro, you would only see the perfrmance of the x700pro, because it can only go so fast
 
Remember, the clock speed is next to irrelevant when comparing dual core and single core. While the dual core may have a much lower clock speed, it will often perform much faster.
 
Ok, Cool, Thanks for the help, I'll go with either the E6300 or the E6400 depending on which one I can afford...
 
Remember, the clock speed is next to irrelevant when comparing dual core and single core. While the dual core may have a much lower clock speed, it will often perform much faster.


Very seldom does that happen with gaming, unless the game uses a dual core patch. I dont know a whole lot of games that do.
 
well, performace per clock is still going to be much better then other crap...

example...

1.83GHz Core 2 Duo E6300
2.4GHz 4000+ San Deigo

reasons for choice: Both have 1MB per core

in a basic single core application, the Core 2 Duo will perform slightly better then the A64, just because it has better architecture..

now, in a game, AFAIK the Core 2 Duo is still better...
 
Back
Top