F Funzo6785 banned Mar 2, 2005 #1 Why do Athlons run at lower GHz than Intel's CPU's and still preform at equal if not better levels
Praetor Administrator Staff member Mar 2, 2005 #2 Because its a different atchitecture ... cant compare based on ghz alone (think of it as revs/min vs #gears) The AMD architecture is significantly more clock-efficient
Because its a different atchitecture ... cant compare based on ghz alone (think of it as revs/min vs #gears) The AMD architecture is significantly more clock-efficient
jancz3rt <b>VIP Member</b> Mar 3, 2005 #3 AMD processors manage more clocks per cycle, hence no need for a larger Ghz value. Praetor said it. JAN
AMD processors manage more clocks per cycle, hence no need for a larger Ghz value. Praetor said it. JAN
Cromewell Administrator Staff member Mar 3, 2005 #4 jancz3rt said: AMD processors manage more clocks per cycle Click to expand... thats uh...not right . It's more operations per clock, where Intel does way more cycles with fewer operations per cycle
jancz3rt said: AMD processors manage more clocks per cycle Click to expand... thats uh...not right . It's more operations per clock, where Intel does way more cycles with fewer operations per cycle
jancz3rt <b>VIP Member</b> Mar 6, 2005 #5 Cromewell said: thats uh...not right . It's more operations per clock, where Intel does way more cycles with fewer operations per cycle Click to expand... LOL - thanx for the correction BRO JAN
Cromewell said: thats uh...not right . It's more operations per clock, where Intel does way more cycles with fewer operations per cycle Click to expand... LOL - thanx for the correction BRO JAN
Cromewell Administrator Staff member Mar 6, 2005 #6 I think you had it right in your head but when you typed it out it came out wrong or typod
The AMD architecture is significantly more clock-efficient
. It's more operations per clock, where Intel does way more cycles with fewer operations per cycle