bad 3dmark06 score

way2evil

Member
hi, i just ran 3dmark06 on my computer and got a 2457. this is about mid-range, correct? well during the red valley test my card ran like crap producing a whopping 0 FPS. thats right 0. is this normal or is something set up wrong?
 
bigsaucybob said:
That seems about average. With an AMD processor im sure things could improve. Or an overclock of your cpu.
Have you ever run the cpu tests?

With my old AMD A64 3200+ OC'd, i still got 0FPS.

And with my current dual-core setup, i got 0FPS (with the exception of 1FPS spikes at the beginning of the test).

0FPS is normal for the CPU tests.
 
same here, although a couple times I hit 2fps. on the second cpu test it was between 0 and 3, while the first one was between zero and 1, with a couple spikes to 2. not a big deal.
 
yep, same here.
0FPS because i think it tries to render the video with the cpu instead of the gpu. i could be wrong though.
that score does seem low for a 7600gs, but it could be any number of things... processor, RAM speed, anything really.
 
Last edited:
fade2green514 said:
yep, same here.
0FPS because i think it tries to render the video with the cpu instead of the gpu. i could be wrong though.
that score does seem low for a 7600gs, but it could be any number of things... processor, RAM speed, anything really.

You are right. In the CPU tests the CPU renders the scene including the shaders etc.
 
fade2green514 said:
yep, same here.
0FPS because i think it tries to render the video with the cpu instead of the gpu. i could be wrong though.
that score does seem low for a 7600gs, but it could be any number of things... processor, RAM speed, anything really.


i think my weak point might be my cpu. its from hp i think they put a cheap one in there. what do you guys think my weak point is? all my parts are from hp so they are really just made by hp with a major companies technology.
 
fade2green514 said:
yep, same here.
0FPS because i think it tries to render the video with the cpu instead of the gpu. i could be wrong though.
Yeah, you are wrong. The processor also handles the AI, game logic and physics, in addition to rendering the scene.
 
[-0MEGA-] said:
The problem is that he has a single core CPU. Its not the video.
I have HT. thats one "real" processer and one "make belieive" one, right? when i get into more upgrading i am going to do my mobo first. When i do my mobo i need to buy new RAM as well. After that I am gonna get a pentium d.
 
way2evil said:
I have HT. thats one "real" processer and one "make belieive" one, right? when i get into more upgrading i am going to do my mobo first. When i do my mobo i need to buy new RAM as well. After that I am gonna get a pentium d.
It's not as a good as a second processor, since it only uses the real cpu's unused clock cycles. So if the cpu is at 100%, then HT doesnt do a whole lot.

I would look into the Pentium D 9xx series, or Athlon X2.
 
[-0MEGA-] said:
Have you ever run the cpu tests?

With my old AMD A64 3200+ OC'd, i still got 0FPS.

And with my current dual-core setup, i got 0FPS (with the exception of 1FPS spikes at the beginning of the test).

0FPS is normal for the CPU tests.

I wasnt exactly referring to the 0FPS issue. more the overall score.
 
if i get an amd x2 do i have to use windows 64bit? i have heard a lot of bad things about it with the drivers and what not. can i use media center instead?
 
You don't need to use Windows 64bit, media centre will work fine. Your score is about right for a 7600GS, though. If it's for gaming, your video card will be the deciding factor. As everyone's said, you don't need to worry about getting 0fps on the CPU tests, that's perfectly normal.
 
Back
Top