Before you blame Vista...

i dont think 28% is that bad...afterall theyre bound to have problems here and there like any company.

it could be the other way round and AMD could have caused 28% of vista crashes...then you would get all the intel fans in here saying the same as what he said but about AMD:D

bahaha. Another reason AMD rules supreme
Click to expand...

i havnt had one problem with my nVidia card or its drivers yet. :confused:
 
i smell something
ati is a partner with microsoft in the xbox graphics engine
nvidia USED to be microsoft's partner but severed ties before they released the fx series. now they are with sony playstation
 
dznutz said:
i smell something
ati is a partner with microsoft in the xbox graphics engine
nvidia USED to be microsoft's partner but severed ties before they released the fx series. now they are with sony playstation
Click to expand...

That makes sense... MS could purposely be making it so it doesn't work well with nVidia cards. It sounds like the sort of thing MS would do. :P
 
I would still rather go with Nvidia than Ati. B/c my pc never has problems so whatever. I had a small problem with the older drivers and smoke in LFS but all is good now. 28% isnt that bad considering the OS is new and was kinda considered a beta back then.
 
g25racer said:
I would still rather go with Nvidia than Ati. B/c my pc never has problems so whatever. I had a small problem with the older drivers and smoke in LFS but all is good now. 28% isnt that bad considering the OS is new and was kinda considered a beta back then.
Click to expand...

Doesn't LFS stand for Linux From Scratch???
 
I started having trouble with nVidia drivers after June 2007. My entire PC would freeze solid and I'd need to pull the plug to get the PC to shut down. I reverted to old drivers and haven't had a problem since... and I use XP!
Tom
 
Although this will never happen, one thing I'd love to see is that Microsoft abandones its native code and uses a UNIX or Linux base and then makes Windows a GUI, just like KDE, GNOME and such. "Winux" is a good name--Windows painted on a UNIX base. It's like a bare piece of wood (UNIX) and Windows is the paint. Right now, Windows doesn't have nothing to paint on but their flimsy code.

Apple did this successfully, why can't Microsoft? (Apple's switch to the UNIX base wasn't very necessary)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top