Black Hole - Benchmark (OLD Version)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Pentium 4's are maybe 32bit only?
Or did you mean your fathers xeon?

His Pentium 4 HT is a BGA 775 so it is 64 Bit. It need driver in order to installing at SCSI hard driver. It is not easy to installing normal windows at Raid and SCSI. Pentium 4 HT Socket 478 is 32 bit only. I have it on my laptop a socket 478.
 
Last edited:
You're sure you closed everything?
It's pretty weird the athlon 64 x2 scores the same...

It's especially weird that the single threaded performance is higher than the multithreaded on a Phenom quad core. Something had to be running.
 
It's especially weird that the single threaded performance is higher than the multithreaded on a Phenom quad core. Something had to be running.

Yeah, but the multithreaded from an i7 920 is almost the same as the i7's singlethreaded.
and the other phenom do that way too.
 
not bad for 5 minutes of work. working from within windows for now. Will try BIOS later to see how it works.
Untitled-149.png
 
^ That is why I like ASUS boards :p I'm tempted to try their auto overclocking feature for a extreme test and see how far the software can get it, I bet it will be close to 4.8 It seemed rather impressive in the demonstration.
 
Pentium 4's are maybe 32bit only?
Or did you mean your fathers xeon?

No some of them are 64-bit. Most of the P4 HTs were 64-bit because I used to use one daily and I had Vista 64-bit and 7 64-bit on it at one point IIRC. I don't think all P4 HTs were 64-bit though.

Dad's Xeon is definitely 64-bit - it's LGA 1156! :D
 
No some of them are 64-bit. Most of the P4 HTs were 64-bit because I used to use one daily and I had Vista 64-bit and 7 64-bit on it at one point IIRC. I don't think all P4 HTs were 64-bit though.

Dad's Xeon is definitely 64-bit - it's LGA 1156! :D

What about your qqqqqqqqquuuuuuuuuuuaaaaaaaaaaaaadddddddddddddddddddd computer for Black Hole test? :D
 
^ That is why I like ASUS boards :p I'm tempted to try their auto overclocking feature for a extreme test and see how far the software can get it, I bet it will be close to 4.8 It seemed rather impressive in the demonstration.
Running the auto overclock, it goes to 4400 ish. 42x103 is what it sets it to. Personally, I think that the BIOS OC could be easier if they could just remove the auto OCer (as it confuses me into pushing it!). Otherwise, I can get up to 4.8GHz, but it throws a warning at me telling me it is hot. So I am going to stay at 4.5GHz until I can get a cooler that does not suck donkey.
 
I was pretty darn close on the total score :) I did think the multithreaded score would be higher.

i792034ghz.jpg


And then 4ghz-

I79204ghz.jpg

Pretty nice scores!
Like said before even multipliers score lower with the 920. You can see the difference between the 920 @4ghz already on the table and yours.
 
Do you have good cooling? Because it's pretty easy to reach at least 4.5ghz with a 920. Want to see it at 5ghz :P. Was planning to do that myself, but bios is locked from my 920....
 
I'm on water cooling yes, BUT this is a C0 chip and unfortunately it did actually take 1.35v to get 4ghz stable.

I'm sure I could get 4.2-4.3 out of it, but prolly not much more.
 
I'm on water cooling yes, BUT this is a C0 chip and unfortunately it did actually take 1.35v to get 4ghz stable.

I'm sure I could get 4.2-4.3 out of it, but prolly not much more.

Try as high as you can. You know the voltage limit lays higher with 1st gen i7's. I wouldn't go above 1.42v with my 2600k. But I would say 1.47v for an i7 920 :D.
Your choice to do it, and what your limit will be.
 
Thermal throttling will be more of an issue. These C0's run hot, even at 4.0ghz 1.35v I hit 75c on water cooling!

But I'll try, probably not tonight anymore though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top