Black Hole - Benchmark (OLD Version)

[Virssagòn]

Yeah hmm something is up, only lost 180 points with turning HT off-

The benchmark is testing multithreaded performance AND stability, the program will the number of the logical cores in threads and then use a multiplier to measure the scores.

 

[Virssagòn]

There's not much difference in the other benches too, on sysmark the i5 even owns it at same clock.http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/108?vs=191

Anyway, seems like the clove isn't that big. Maybe I'll see to pick a lineup for the MT in the alpha.

 

[87dtna]

It's 5 times the difference what are you talking about?

There's a 1000 point difference with HT on a 2600k VS 2500k....but not even 200 point difference on Lynnfield CPU's HT vs no HT?

 

[Virssagòn]

It's 5 times the difference what are you talking about?

There's a 1000 point difference with HT on a 2600k VS 2500k....but not even 200 point difference on Lynnfield CPU's HT vs no HT?

Yeah, it's pretty weird... If you look up i5 2500k and 2600k at anand, you can see that there's is also a bigger difference there.

 

[Virssagòn]

Lol, phenom x6 do have nice multi I see!
I'm curious what it would do on 5.2ghz or something
Sad nobody is yet playing with ln2 or dice to do it...

Singlethreaded is bad though... I think it'd beat an FX8350 easily on MT (same clockspeed)

 

[turbobooster]

smileman asked my to do the benchmark at stock with turbo on, so here it is



this is amd fx 8320 at stock

 

[turbobooster]

Lol, phenom x6 do have nice multi I see!
I'm curious what it would do on 5.2ghz or something
Sad nobody is yet playing with ln2 or dice to do it...

Singlethreaded is bad though... I think it'd beat an FX8350 easily on MT (same clockspeed)

amd fx 8320 at stock.

 

[87dtna]

Thats version 4.1, everyone is posting 4.2 as of late.

 

[turbobooster]

Thats version 4.1, everyone is posting 4.2 as of late.

i know was the wrong 1 the other 1 i do tommorow

 

[Virssagòn]

Yeah, plz test the 4.2 at stock.

I'm making a stock scoreboard, so if someone has the time to do a stockrun that'd be awesome!

 

[turbobooster]

Yeah, plz test the 4.2 at stock.

I'm making a stock scoreboard, so if someone has the time to do a stockrun that'd be awesome!

i will do that.
but the problem i somtimes have with the v.2 is that you wont do the 4 core test.

 

[Virssagòn]

i will do that.
but the problem i somtimes have with the v.2 is that you wont do the 4 core test.

You're not the first person, most of the time it's fixed in the second run.
When does this problem occur mostly? My rig doesn't have problems with it, maybe it's only on Fx cpus?

 

[StrangleHold]

Ran 4.2 on mine.

The multi did fine, ran all 8 cores 100%.

The 4 threaded only used 2 cores, then with about 10 seconds left a third core kicked in, then right at the end the fourth core kicked in.

Single threaded started with a single core around 10%, then about half way it jumped to 100%

 

[Virssagòn]

Ran 4.2 on mine.

The multi did fine, ran all 8 cores 100%.

The 4 threaded only used 2 cores, then with about 10 seconds left a third core kicked in, then right at the end the fourth core kicked in.

Single threaded started with a single core around 10%, then about half way it jumped to 100%

Single and multithreaded should be perfectly fine, 4threads has some bugs though...
What's your 4thread score and did you try running it again?

 

[StrangleHold]

OK I ran it twice before but this time it was fine. Ran all 4 cores and on the single did 100% too, weird, lol. Now this isnt on mine, its another 8120 I have running at 4.2ghz.

Multi 5560
4 threads 4584
Single 2737
Total 12880

 

[Virssagòn]

OK I ran it twice before but this time it was fine. Ran all 4 cores and on the single did 100% too, weird, lol. Now this isnt on mine, its another 8120 I have running at 4.2ghz.

Multi 5560
4 threads 4584
Single 2737
Total 12880

This is an ok score, it's probably if the program doesn't know or the extras are physical or logical that he doesn't know what to do...
Could you run it at stock? So I can add an FX8120 to the list? Now got 12 stock cpus on it. (And 300+ overclocked on beta version, didn't do that manually lol...)

 

[turbobooster]

so today everithing wend fine wite the 4 threaded started with 4 cores the first time, ole.

this is the score at stock turbo on.

 

[Virssagòn]

That's a pretty nice score, did you close everything even in background?

 

[turbobooster]

That's a pretty nice score, did you close everything even in background?

yes i closed almost everithing.

 

[Virssagòn]

yes i closed almost everithing.

EVERYTHING !!! (joking) ;P
it does affect the score pretty much, even programs on background. Anyway, you're 100 points ahead of a FX8150 (which is clocked higher then yours I think)