Black Hole - Benchmark (OLD Version)

Status
Not open for further replies.
If you want to see how a proper dual-core performs against all the quads here, I can ask my Grandad to test the benchmark on his Pentium Dual-Core and post results back. :)

Good to see the Athlon is still stone-dead last! :P
 
spirit said:
If you want to see how a proper dual-core performs against all the quads here, I can ask my Grandad to test the benchmark on his Pentium Dual-Core and post results back. :)

Good to see the Athlon is still stone-dead last! :P
Click to expand...

Yeah! Would be nice.
my granny also has 2 pc's, sad they're both 32bit...
 
SmileMan said:
Yeah, me too! And I'm also interested in an oc'd phenom and an oc'd 1st gen intel ;p.
Click to expand...
What are you referring to with first gen intel? Because that would be a 4004, and I don't think you will hot 1MHz if it is possible at all to run them. Also good luck with 64 bit as it is a 4 bit processor. Would be interested to see a linux machine running on it though. :)

Maybe you mean core 2, or the 1156/1366 core series?
 
I'm meaning first gen i5 - i7, because they're on much slower clock speed. I want to see them on the same speed as the 2nd and 3rd gens.
 
I would be interested to see a P55 based i7 quad running at the same speed as the 2600 and 3770 to see how it compares.
 
I do not know what I am going to do right now. My CPU is up for sale with the graphics card. If it sells, then good, I will go to something else. Right now I am debating between a monitor, a new GPU, or a new board to OC my 2600k again.
 
SmileMan said:
I'm meaning first gen i5 - i7, because they're on much slower clock speed. I want to see them on the same speed as the 2nd and 3rd gens.
Click to expand...

If we had made this benchmark about 10 months ago I could have told you how it ran on an 1156 i5 760!

Here is what my Grandad got on his E6500 @ stock.

BlackholeTest.jpg
CPUTest.jpg
 
A stock e6500 scores 643 and a phenom ii quad at 3.5ghz only scores 734? Thats a little bogus....i mean i'm an intel fan and even i think thats bs.
 
87dtna said:
A stock e6500 scores 643 and a phenom ii quad at 3.5ghz only scores 734? Thats a little bogus....i mean i'm an intel fan and even i think thats bs.
Click to expand...

yeh, you have to look to the singlethreaded. The phenom is beaten there...
That's a big point were amd has to work on.
 
I predicted that the score would be about 600-700 for the E6500 in the email which I sent Grandad. Looks like I predicted correctly!
 
Hmm, if I see it correctly. The floating point maths with all amd's is really bad in comparison with the intels. With the next version I'll scale integer maths higher.

Look at these;

39115693.jpg


capturewg.jpg


blackholev3.png


And then the dual core:

BlackholeTest.jpg


really weird...

That explains why amd scored that low always. (but intels will still score better when I would remove the floating point though...)

Damn! I thought I made it much better... Now I'll need to update in a month or something. Because now there are too much tests already :S
 
Last edited:
SmileMan said:
though, the multithreaded is pretty bad :P
Click to expand...

It is only a low end dual-core after all. It would be interesting to see if somebody had a higher end dual core such as an E8400 or an E8500 or maybe even something like an X6800 to try this out on. It would be interesting to compare scores to the E6500.
 
spirit said:
It is only a low end dual-core after all. It would be interesting to see if somebody had a higher end dual core, such as an E8400 or maybe even something like an X6800, to try this out on.
Click to expand...

We gonna release the awards shortly, so we can update that floating point. Amd's get backed by that.
 
Last edited:
spirit said:
Give it a bit longer man, this was only released the other day! ;)
Click to expand...

Yeah, I'll give it a go for a month and a bit. So we can find more bugs then this one. After this month I can fix the bugs. Sorry amd, but floating point is not your best side!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top