Black Hole - Benchmark (OLD Version)

Status
Not open for further replies.
spirit said:
Yeah, is your 1090T at stock? Overclocking does actually help quite a lot in this benchmark. :)
Click to expand...

Yeah, I have never overclocked and don't want to risk my cpu as I can't afford another, also the most demanding game I play on my pc is civ on full graphics so I am doubting I would need to, I think my current graphics card would probably struggle with anything much more anyway, I was thinking civ 5 and skyrim, but I want them on full graphics so I think it's time for a gpu upgrade
 
tech savvy said:
Wow, [email protected]. Is your Vcore set on auto, or manual? Does all Phenom's use that much vcore, or is it just your chip?
Click to expand...

It was actually set 1.450 (needed to get it stable at 4.00ghz) , up from 1.425 which is what it defaults too at stock speeds, might try and push it lower tbh but it runs fine with ok temps

Edit at stock it runs at 1.408v, I had manually set it to 1.424 but I was software occing at the time and turbo v advised it was set at 1.450v. The phenom seems to run at stock between 1.392v and up at stock speeds. now running prime @ 3.8ghz and voltage default voltage is shown as 1.376 and fans on max

Apparently these phenoms can be pushed beyond 1.55v (that figure is the max recommended by amd(
 
Last edited:
New laptop. Ignore the bloatware, haven't gotten around to reinstall.

Edit: the CPU is clocked at 2.30ghz.

w623X.jpg
 
Don't really care for benchmarks etc these days,as long as i get good gaming performance (Which it does very well)...im happy. :)

SKORE_zps48c5a33d.png
 
Nevakonaza said:
Don't really care for benchmarks etc these days,as long as i get good gaming performance (Which it does very well)...im happy. :)

SKORE_zps48c5a33d.png
Click to expand...

That's why I like intel, look at his Singlethreaded and floating point performance!
That's the most important part if you're browsing,... if you got 4 cores and that Singlethreaded performance, you can be sure that 6,8,12 logical cores won't be faster!
 
Interesting how my 2500K @ 4.3 scores 1436 yet Nev's 3570K @ 4.2 scores 1386. I thought the scores may be a little closer.
 
Yeah that's what I thought, or at least he should only be a couple of points below me. 100MHz doesn't make much difference. Could be because I have more RAM though. I've got twice as much as him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top