Well thats mainly because the C2D is a dual-core, whereas the P4 is not. You should have compared the PD if you wanted a fairer comparison, although thats not what he asked so..no, better
CPU MARK :
p4 3ghz - 474
e6300 - 1390
Depends on the benchmark, but even when comparing the 1.86Ghz C2D to a 3.0Ghz PD, the Core 2 Duo would be the best processor overall, especially in games.Btw how much the difference between PD ane C2D?
Is it 50%, because i once see a benchmark comparison between processor and its only differ about 10-20% performance from c2d vs pd.
Hmm i see then is it worth to upgrade my PD 945 to C2D E6420
Well the reason its E3600 vs E3620 is because I dont have the time to do a build so Im just getting either a HP or Dell workstation to hold me over since trying to do graphic design jobs on a 1.6Ghz semperon isnt cutting it
Someone talking about running a game here, well just want to add.
How much the performance impact would a processor do, for example i use PD 945.
So far as i know its only the matter of speed right? The other depend on ram, vga, and hdd.
Since i can play supreme commander, stalker, dirt, or company of heroes without problem aside of graphic and memory requirement.