Counter-Strike

1.6 is old school, thats what i play... source is newer and looks better, so is the choice of new players. Old players tend to go for classic, hence 1.6

I think source has a bigger following now.

dragon
 
1.6 is old school, thats what i play... source is newer and looks better, so is the choice of new players. Old players tend to go for classic, hence 1.6

I think source has a bigger following now.

dragon

plus many 1.6 didnt like the feel of source as many actual playing things were changed
 
I play source, 1.6 and the original. There all fun to me. I like the looks of source, but i hate how the weapons shoot differently then 1.6
 
1.6 is more for professionals and hardcore gamers. I prefer Source, simply because of the better graphics and physics engine.
 
I play css, but was a cs'er for a long time before css.

I hate it when people say that 1.6 or any of the older versions are more realistic.

Ok, so shooting threw cement walls is realistic?
And spraying at the ground and getting hs is realistic lol. Sure.

When I play cs (older versions ) its so easy to get hs. I don't care who's hitboxxes are smaller, they just stay with cs since it's what they know. They don't like the realistic change.

Bob
 
I play CS:S. Well, I actually run a clan with 2 public servers on CS:S :). As for the 'And spraying at the ground and getting hs is realistic lol. Sure.' comment, although rare, it's possible. A projectile can easily ricochet from the ground upwards, both in game and in real life.
 
No, it doesnt appear, from personal play on both, to be that much different. CS 1.6 to me was 1.5, just with very minor graphics tweaks, more maps and 2 added guns.
 
I played since beta 1 then version 1.0 version 1.1 version 1.3 version 1.4 version 1.5 and 1.6 now source. Its been like 8 years now!!! Ive been in many clans,scrimed many clans I know I scrimed some of the cals in pub ( yeah in a pub server)Believe they were cal im. they were good but they knew where i came from too.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top