Timo
New Member
Don't mind the thread name, I can imagine you guys getting a lot of these threads with the new Processors coming up. You must get more of these threads ofcourse. But this one is an easy one, I'd like some opinions on which one to take from the following two:
Or…
Now I want an opinion non which system to take, take in mind I am going for future proof and good frames for practically everything you throw at it. Ofcourse I want a normal working PC for work etc. but I am sure if it can give a good Framerate then it’ll do fine in normal surroundings (seeing it has 4 cores).
Both systems cost practically the same (the price difference is less then 1%).
And before someone stars: yes I can put the Accelero's on when the cards are in SLI, I can either bend 2 fins on the Accelero in between both so the standard SLI bridge will fit through (or hope it does standard) or I can get myself a flexible SLI bridge (for not much, the Q6600 system will be higher max 1.5% then the Q9450 system).
I myself am leaning towards the Q6600 seeing it will get me more bang for less bucks up against the Q9450 system. And both are about the same to overclock (although the Q9450 will be a bit less of a hothead, but that's no problem if you have 2 fans sticked on your Scythe Infinity where one has 110CFM on max).
I'm pushing towards that Q6600 seeing it OC's good and works on a 680i chipset (XFX 680i LT). Not that the Q9450 doesn't OC good, but it won't work on that same 680i board. And seeing the 780i/790i is out of my budget I'd have to get a 750i for future SLI... And I prefer two PCI-e 16x slots over one x16 PCI-e v2.0 slot and one x8 PCI-e (v2.0 ?) slot... The V2.0 hardly brings anything more seeing the 8800GT's wont use the total bandwith of the genereal x16 slots anyway.
I thank you in advance
Gr.
Timo
(PS, about the PCI-e V2.0, I mean that it won't use up the total bandwith of the x16 V1.0 slot when you play at 1600*1200 with some AA and AF on. Perhaps at 2560×1600 you might use up the max and then v2.0 might bring a tiny little bit extra... But the screen I am getting only does max 1680*1050, not much need for it then)
Q9450 (maybe OC it to about 2.8)
Asus P5N-D (for possible SLI in the future)
8800GT (1)
Corsair CL4 PC6400
And ofcourse all of the rest of the computer (Scythe Infinity and a Accelero S1 Rev. 2 for cooling).
Or…
Q6600 (most likely up to around 2.8)
XFX 680i LT SLI
Two 8800GT’s
Corsair CL4 PC6400
And again the rest of the computer (plus the same coolers).
Now I want an opinion non which system to take, take in mind I am going for future proof and good frames for practically everything you throw at it. Ofcourse I want a normal working PC for work etc. but I am sure if it can give a good Framerate then it’ll do fine in normal surroundings (seeing it has 4 cores).
Both systems cost practically the same (the price difference is less then 1%).
And before someone stars: yes I can put the Accelero's on when the cards are in SLI, I can either bend 2 fins on the Accelero in between both so the standard SLI bridge will fit through (or hope it does standard) or I can get myself a flexible SLI bridge (for not much, the Q6600 system will be higher max 1.5% then the Q9450 system).
I myself am leaning towards the Q6600 seeing it will get me more bang for less bucks up against the Q9450 system. And both are about the same to overclock (although the Q9450 will be a bit less of a hothead, but that's no problem if you have 2 fans sticked on your Scythe Infinity where one has 110CFM on max).
I'm pushing towards that Q6600 seeing it OC's good and works on a 680i chipset (XFX 680i LT). Not that the Q9450 doesn't OC good, but it won't work on that same 680i board. And seeing the 780i/790i is out of my budget I'd have to get a 750i for future SLI... And I prefer two PCI-e 16x slots over one x16 PCI-e v2.0 slot and one x8 PCI-e (v2.0 ?) slot... The V2.0 hardly brings anything more seeing the 8800GT's wont use the total bandwith of the genereal x16 slots anyway.
I thank you in advance
Gr.
Timo
(PS, about the PCI-e V2.0, I mean that it won't use up the total bandwith of the x16 V1.0 slot when you play at 1600*1200 with some AA and AF on. Perhaps at 2560×1600 you might use up the max and then v2.0 might bring a tiny little bit extra... But the screen I am getting only does max 1680*1050, not much need for it then)