Crimsonnaire
Member
Hey, everyone.
Something I've recently been trying to figure out is the difference between fan RPM vs its design (blade slope & number of blades). Here are two pictures for comparison:
The Intel fan operates at about 2100 RPM and the Cooler Master counterpart at 2200 RPM (just about the same). However, the CM fan has has 2 blades more, and the blades are sloped higher. Given the difference in fan design, one would surmise that the CM offers a significantly higher airflow over the stock Intel fan. Now if this is true, does it mean that the CPU (Celeron E1200 in this case) life will be substantially extended above what is expected from running the stock fan, or are the circumstances that determine CPU longevity (routing design/clock speed/frequency, etc.) such that having an operating temperature margin greater than a certain amount below the normal range inconsequential, and the CPU still lasting the same time? Or is it just the simple principle that the lower the temperature, the longer the CPU lasts, and conversely, the hotter the temperature, the shorter it lasts?
Also, if a fan produces higher airlow over another at the same RPM because of its design, can it be assumed that, in the event of a malfunction such as bearing failure, the better designed fan will still produce adequate cooling despite the lowered RPM?
Any clarification is greatly appreciated.
Something I've recently been trying to figure out is the difference between fan RPM vs its design (blade slope & number of blades). Here are two pictures for comparison:
The Intel fan operates at about 2100 RPM and the Cooler Master counterpart at 2200 RPM (just about the same). However, the CM fan has has 2 blades more, and the blades are sloped higher. Given the difference in fan design, one would surmise that the CM offers a significantly higher airflow over the stock Intel fan. Now if this is true, does it mean that the CPU (Celeron E1200 in this case) life will be substantially extended above what is expected from running the stock fan, or are the circumstances that determine CPU longevity (routing design/clock speed/frequency, etc.) such that having an operating temperature margin greater than a certain amount below the normal range inconsequential, and the CPU still lasting the same time? Or is it just the simple principle that the lower the temperature, the longer the CPU lasts, and conversely, the hotter the temperature, the shorter it lasts?
Also, if a fan produces higher airlow over another at the same RPM because of its design, can it be assumed that, in the event of a malfunction such as bearing failure, the better designed fan will still produce adequate cooling despite the lowered RPM?
Any clarification is greatly appreciated.
Last edited: