AdmnPower
VIP Member
I found out something interesting about the new Far Cry game. It looks to me like there are much fewer video quality adjustments on Primal. Oddly enough, I feel like Far Cry 4 can push my system more than Primal can.
A little background on my system and the game performance.
System Spec
Intel i7-4790K 4.00GHz
32GB DDR3 1600 Memory
Nvidia GTX 980
1 x 250GB SSD
2 x 1TB Seagate Desktop Drive (Raid 0)
To keep an even paying field I used the GeForce experience app to turn the settings on both games all the way up.
Far Cry 4 gives me about an average of about 30 fps with a low around 22 and a high in the upper 40's
Far Cry Primal gives an average of about 60 fps with a low in the 50's and high in the 80's
I guess what I'm wondering is if they dummed the game down or if it's just that much better optimized than Far Cry 4 was. If you look at the recommended system requirements they are quite a bit higher on Primal than on 4.
I'm not complaining that the new game runs better, I'm really just looking to start a conversation because the whole situation just seems strange to me.
A little background on my system and the game performance.
System Spec
Intel i7-4790K 4.00GHz
32GB DDR3 1600 Memory
Nvidia GTX 980
1 x 250GB SSD
2 x 1TB Seagate Desktop Drive (Raid 0)
To keep an even paying field I used the GeForce experience app to turn the settings on both games all the way up.
Far Cry 4 gives me about an average of about 30 fps with a low around 22 and a high in the upper 40's
Far Cry Primal gives an average of about 60 fps with a low in the 50's and high in the 80's
I guess what I'm wondering is if they dummed the game down or if it's just that much better optimized than Far Cry 4 was. If you look at the recommended system requirements they are quite a bit higher on Primal than on 4.
I'm not complaining that the new game runs better, I'm really just looking to start a conversation because the whole situation just seems strange to me.