Hello everyone,
I've been using a file shredder for some time called Eraser.
Recently, I started using a file recovery program called Recuva.
I'm not, however, interested in these programs specifically; I'm interested in how these types of programs work.
Recuva is able to show a list of erased files on a drive.
Many are unrecoverable because they have been overwritten.
But, Recuva still shows the name of the overwritten file.
Some of these files have "normal" names like acpi.mod.
But, some have strange names like 67Ims{bmdY7l9uQ[q(.
Are these strange names the result of the file having been erased with a shredder?
Also, how can you shred a file and leave absolutely no trace whatsoever?
Leaving behind file names is like leaving a meta-data trail.
The recovery software can tell the name of the file that overwrote an earlier file.
How?
How can the recovery software find the name of the file that was there originally after it was overwritten?
Is it possible to shred a drive and leave no trace of anything at all in such a way that if you were to try to run a recovery program focusing on that drive it would return nothing at all?
Also, I noticed that Recuva has a gradation of file designations referring to how well a file can be recovered.
If a file is 'excellent', it hasn't been overwritten at all and can be fully recovered.
But, there are also 'unrecoverable' and 'very poor' designations as well.
The 'excellent' and 'unrecoverable' designations make sense to me.
Either a file can be recovered or not.
But the 'very poor' designation doesn't make sense to me.
How could a file be somewhere in between?
Is it because only some of the file's clusters have been overwritten but not all of them?
Thanks.
I've been using a file shredder for some time called Eraser.
Recently, I started using a file recovery program called Recuva.
I'm not, however, interested in these programs specifically; I'm interested in how these types of programs work.
Recuva is able to show a list of erased files on a drive.
Many are unrecoverable because they have been overwritten.
But, Recuva still shows the name of the overwritten file.
Some of these files have "normal" names like acpi.mod.
But, some have strange names like 67Ims{bmdY7l9uQ[q(.
Are these strange names the result of the file having been erased with a shredder?
Also, how can you shred a file and leave absolutely no trace whatsoever?
Leaving behind file names is like leaving a meta-data trail.
The recovery software can tell the name of the file that overwrote an earlier file.
How?
How can the recovery software find the name of the file that was there originally after it was overwritten?
Is it possible to shred a drive and leave no trace of anything at all in such a way that if you were to try to run a recovery program focusing on that drive it would return nothing at all?
Also, I noticed that Recuva has a gradation of file designations referring to how well a file can be recovered.
If a file is 'excellent', it hasn't been overwritten at all and can be fully recovered.
But, there are also 'unrecoverable' and 'very poor' designations as well.
The 'excellent' and 'unrecoverable' designations make sense to me.
Either a file can be recovered or not.
But the 'very poor' designation doesn't make sense to me.
How could a file be somewhere in between?
Is it because only some of the file's clusters have been overwritten but not all of them?
Thanks.