Spesh
New Member
i know it's not 0, but it's not a huge difference, it's not going to like half the crap.
Trust me, it's a big difference. Bigger than you probably think.
i know it's not 0, but it's not a huge difference, it's not going to like half the crap.
But truly overclocking any sandy bridge processor is just to show off, there is no real need for it at all, and defenitely in gaming you will see 0 benefits
johnny, i would suggest that you actually USE a processor, standard then overclocked, before making complete bullshit claims.
There are many hundreds of members that will make testament to the fact that overclocking seriously improves system performance, with me one of them.
Don't knock something you've never tried. Remember, we've used them, you haven't.
I'll definitely have to do some more research into it before giving it a shot
On an unrelated note, I noticed another thread asking what a good size for a SSD was if it was just storing an operating system and some often used programs? Is the 90GB I have going to cut it?
Depending what cpu you have, you can also overclock by raising the bus speed. If you only use the multiplyer then you are just increasing the speed at which the cpu can process data. However, If you raise the bus speed, you not only increase the speed at which data is processed, you also increase the amount of data that can pass into the cpu. It has the effect of overclocking the whole system.
X58 was good because it gave overclockers the ability to play with the bus speed aswell as the multiplier. This does however usually result in a lot more trial and error, as it becomes a case of trying to finely balance the two.
FSB overclocking is not possible on a 1155 (Sandy Bridge, second generation Core I3,I5 and I7) processor. The whole system becomes unstable, and you start to lose data from the hard drives/
-EDIT-
501 posts!!!1!!1!1one