So much graphs right?
Much graphs, such wow. Sure looks like opinions to me.
You might want to reconsider spewing out numerical values with no calculations because unlike you, other people actually spent the time to analyze it.
https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/4tztue/gtx_1060_vs_rx_480_a_statsbased_analysis_with/
https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/4tyco0/the_truth_about_480_vs_1060/
Don't want to read it? Here's a summary one of them wrote.
Well would you look at that. It's on average only 13.72% faster than a 480. Sure doesn't look like 20% to me. If you look at the actual excel spreadsheet from the second link, you'll find that there's only 2 Vulkan benchmarks. Not a great pool of data for that one.
Here's a pic too.
And don't even bother trying to argue with using outliers in the data to back up your statement as that's incorrect interpretation of statistics.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying the 1060 isn't a good card, but to say that it's much faster as a blanket statement is false. Both cards are direct competitors of one another, and you won't see significant performance differences both in gaming benchmarks and synthetic benchmarks.
