Build quality is about design and assembly. Not what brand parts go into it. If a total idiot tries to build a computer with massive static in him,its going to be bad build quality weather its a K6-2 or a 2500K, Geforce 16Mb or HD6990.
How is build quality not about what parts go into it? You're saying Acer hires static filled employees to build computers, and that Toshiba doesn't? Basically my question is, have you personally ever been to an Acer or Toshiba factory, and seen that Acer conditions, assembly, and builds are "piss poor" compared to Toshiba. Though you may have me on the transmission ordeal (even though it was a ridiculous analogy in the beginning) I don't think your bashing of Acer is warranted, and I think people like yourself slander companies without true merit.
you have just shown how little you actually understand what yor trying to argue. Ford discontinued their in house transmission shop in 1993. Chevrolet transmissions have been manufactured at independent shops since they discontinued the Turboglide in the late 50's. Dodge never had an in house transmisson shop. Bendix (NV3400 for chevy and dodge, NV3300 for chevy and dodge, NV4400 for dodge, NV4500 for chevy and dodge (grandads 98 3500 cummins has this trans), and NV5600 for dodge and chevy) Borg-Warner (they made the t-19, 3.03, 4.04, and E4OD ford transmissions, as well as the th350, th400, th700R4, t18, t19, and 4.04 for Chevy), Eaton-Fuller (found a home in a lot of the light duty manual trans trucks of the late 80s. Also maker of the Dodge contracted 727 3speed automatic, and all dodge 4, 5 and 6 speed autos). Rockwell should also be noted as the maker of all C6HD automatics found in ford trucks between 1978 and 1993.
Basically man, your talking out your ass.
Basically man, how long did it take you to create that huge mass of text from Google?
And Nissan? And Honda? And Toyota? And Saab? There are no other car companies that build their own transmissions? Even if they don't build their transmissions, surely they design them, no?
And vehicle transmissions are built faulty quite often.
I'm sorry, I must have missed this earlier:
First you state:
they (Acer) dont really have low build quality, they are good build quality on some crappy parts.
Then, you just told me:
Build quality is about design and assembly. Not what brand parts go into it. If a total idiot tries to build a computer with massive static in him,its going to be bad build quality weather
Dude, brotha, dawg; those two statements contradict what you are trying to press upon me. And, well, they just don't make sense.
So Acer doesn't really have bad build quality, they are just built on crappy parts, even though build quality is about design and assembly? I'm, uh, wait, what? I think I see what you're trying to achieve, but you should probably clarify better, even though what you're achieving to clarify makes ZERO sense.
In fact, HP had some issues a few years ago with some laptops; the nVidia M graphics chips were faulty, causing overheating, resulting in no video, etc. Everyone stated it was HP's fault, however, it was nVidia. They built the chip, HP just assembled it, correct? HP payed nicely for nVidia's mistake, but it happens. Not the assembler's fault, though. So brand name parts that go into a computer by Acer or Toshiba can affect build quality, I would think.
