Ummm fade2green- your RAM speeds are really slow, i get like 2150mbps. That doesnt make any sense if your CPU is goin faster than an FX-60.fade2green514 said:exactly my thoughts.
don't forget to run memtest to around 1500% to be sure, and dual prime95 for 24hrs at least.
i'd like to see some other benchmarkslike a superiPi maybe
and some cpu temps! lol
lol too bad my processor's running slightly faster than an FX-60 right, i beat yours on both multimedia, and the second arithmetic... and the first arithmetic is very close...
my rams still faster tho lol, by 200-500mbps depending on where i have it. its ran stable for me at ddr532 before..
god i hate the limits that they put on pictures in this forum.. how did u get such high quality pics in here?
btw why are you running the outdated version of sisoftware? lol i believe they have a new "lite 2007" out.
fade2green514 said:50C is extremely high for 65nm... 64C is max for 65nm... that'd mean that 50C cuts cpu life a lot..
especially for an arctic cooling freezer... most people said that their cpu's never went over 50C in a full load... unless their idle temps were higher lol in which case they don't know what they're doing...
also, 1.5V is extremely high for 65nm as well. i'd be careful with that voltage up that high.
also, did you run dual prime for 24hours? lol
and memtest 1500%?
depends on how well you apply it, and how you apply it.
if you took the IHS off the cpu, and lapped the heatsink down to a mirror finish, or around 2500-3000 grit you'd probably stay below 30C idle, and with a better fan, below 45C full load (yes at 4ghz)
what in the world?
what are you talking about?
also, omega.. what you're forgetting is that sisoftware isn't the only benchmark. i bet my processor would beat yours in almost any game out there at any quality (not to mention the video card lol). besides, i haven't even pushed my processor to the limit because i don't like my temp to go above 45C at any given point. i never got water cooling, instead i decided to try lapping the cpu IHS and heatsink (i may even remove the IHS to gain 5-10C) and so far ive gotten an extra 5-10C out of the 2500grit finish that i've achieved.
pentium D's are better at some things, and i customized my system for some multithreading and a lot of gaming.
you had to push yours to the same voltage as mine to get slightly below my performance... mine can handle a lot more voltage because its 90nm, 1.6-1.65V some have even reached 1.85V before (however unsafe and cuts the cpu life in like 1/8 lol, though they're running at like -20C in full load LOL)
90nm will create a bit more heat... but its also sturdier and can handle more heat (and more voltage)
Burgerbob said:Ummm fade2green- your RAM speeds are really slow, i get like 2150mbps. That doesnt make any sense if your CPU is goin faster than an FX-60.
yea, thats exactly what i meant.mrjack said:He meant 200 to 500Mbps faster, than Omega's.
Especially since this was my threadliquidshadow said:Um...2.6 GHZ isn't something to brag about. Also, some people don't want to hear it. It's not easy to do but it's not like it's uncommon - many people have gotten overclocks up that high and some higher.
It was very easy to get to 3.6Ghz, thats the highest i can get without extreme voltage increases.Dialamo said:OMEGA, how simple was it for you to get to 3.6GHz before? Did voltages need to be increased? How were the temps? Instead of a X2 4200+, should I get this processor, save a bit of money, then have a chance to get Conroe when I save up some money?