new batches 3570k

I think there's no chance running that speed 100% under 1.35v with a 3570k lol.
Maybe cpu-z was stuck for a moment... Or it was only 1-2 sec running 100% and cpu-z hadn't refreshed the voltage yet. (Or a serious vdroop, but that's not realistic lol)
 
I think there's no chance running that speed 100% under 1.35v with a 3570k lol.
Maybe cpu-z was stuck for a moment... Or it was only 1-2 sec running 100% and cpu-z hadn't refreshed the voltage yet. (Or a serious vdroop, but that's not realistic lol)

I agree.. no way that is a legit reading!
 
Proof in form of validations please. It is easy to photoshop in numbers. validations are harder to fake.

That aside, who gives a crap. It will not change the price. It will not change processor recommendations. In the grand scheme, it changes nothing, assuming it is real.
 


for all you non believers, here is the cpu-z valadetion, and read the link that i put with it.
from overclock.net.
its no crap just read it.
 
Last edited:
I would be willing to bet that they don't really have an issue with them as is.

That said, it is all well and good that they can get 5GHz+ at near stock volts. But ut that on 24 hour Prime and see how fast you have to shoot it up to normal levels again.
 
Nice! Forget the hater's, they're just jealous! They all know, if they had the 3570k, that could hit 5MHz+ @ near stock voltage, they be flaunting it to. Good Job!
 
Well, you are the one that is linking them. So far you gave 2 sites that have the exact same info, and they are references to other sites. Sorry, I don't believe it. One golden chip in a 100,000 is about right. No different than a 2600k that does 5Ghz @ 1.300V.

IN the long term, it still changes exactly nothing, except a few people claiming that they will all do that, and then get IVB handed down through history as great chips. The price will not be going down, the chips that we recommend will not change, the motherboards we recommend will not change (though if the OT (original tester) that did these tests was on a ASrock board then we have found the amazing, as they report the Vcore well below what it actually is, and any voltmeter/multimeter will prove that).

Don't get me wrong, if there is a new stepping (that seems to be serious top secret info according to your links), then it is good. But you are making a big deal out of absolutely nothing.
 
it has nothing to do with a golden chip.
me and 2 other people we know picked up a new 3570k and the do all around 5ghz with that volt.
the first chip, what was tested, did on 1.6v and ln2 6.2ghz
and yes a give to sites, but put in a little work youre self and you will find more sites.

you can even read about it on hwbot, a well known overclock site.
 
I still maintain you are making a big deal out of nothing. Outside of distributed computing, you are not going to be able to take full advantage of your speed, and there is STILL NO GUARANTEE THAT ANY CHIP WILL REACH 1MHz ABOVE STOCK, new stepping or not. In the scheme of computers, all you have there is bragging rites and a high electric bill.
 
yes for normal use its true, big bill, but this forum is also a site for overclockers, and for them it will by a good chip.
if its true that these chips, are a previeuw what haswell can do then its interresting
 
Back
Top